Helicopter Physics: Finding Time to Reach Ground from Release Point

  • Thread starter Thread starter chocolatelover
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Helicopter Physics
AI Thread Summary
The height of a helicopter releasing a mailbag is described by the equation h=2.55t^3, with the bag released at 1.85 seconds. To find the time it takes for the mailbag to reach the ground, the initial height at the moment of release must be calculated using the given formula. The initial velocity of the mailbag is debated, with some asserting it is zero while others suggest it should be calculated based on the helicopter's height at release. The gravitational acceleration is factored into the equation h=vit+1/2at^2 to solve for the time until the bag hits the ground. Ultimately, the calculations yield a time of approximately 1.56 seconds for the mailbag to reach the ground after release.
chocolatelover
Messages
238
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The height of a helicopter above the ground is given by h=2.55t^3, where h is in meters and t is in seconds. At 1.85 s, the helicopter releases a small mailbag. How long after its release does the mailbag reach the ground?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



_____________________________h=2.55t^3
1.85s

h=2.55(1.85s)^3

Thank you very much
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm fairly sure that you can make use of the formula:

h=v_{i}t+\frac{1}{2}at^2

And do it as you started:

2.55(1.85)^3=v_{i}t+\frac{1}{2}at^2

And then initial velocity is zero, and a is the gravitational constant g=9.8m/s^2:

2.55(1.85)^3=0t+\frac{1}{2}9.8t^2

And then solve for t.
 
methotrexate said:
I'm fairly sure that you can make use of the formula:

h=v_{i}t+\frac{1}{2}at^2

And do it as you started:

2.55(1.85)^3=v_{i}t+\frac{1}{2}at^2

And then initial velocity is zero, and a is the gravitational constant g=9.8m/s^2:

2.55(1.85)^3=0t+\frac{1}{2}9.8t^2

And then solve for t.
WHO IN THE WORLD TOLD YOU THAT THE INITIAL SPEED OF THE BAG IS ZERO?
 
Thank you very much

If it isn't 0, how would you solve it?

Would you do this?

velocity:
h=3.25t^3
h'=9.75t^2
h'(1.65)=9.75(1.62)^2
=26.5444

position:

h=3.25(1.65)^3
=14.6m

I would then use all of this to solve for t, right?

h=vit+1/2at^2
14.6m=26.5444m/s+1/2(-9.8m/s^2)t^2
t=1.56s

Thank you
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top