Hello, light freaks: UV radiant intensity of the sun at earth surface

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on comparing the UV radiant intensity from a mercury short arc lamp used in fluorescence microscopy to that of sunlight at the Earth's surface. The user calculates the lamp's irradiance, finding it significantly higher than the sun's UV output, which raises concerns about eye safety. It is emphasized that UV light from any lab source should be blocked from reaching the eyes, recommending proper protective eyewear or enclosing the light path. The importance of consulting with experienced individuals when handling UV sources is also highlighted. Overall, the user concludes that special UV eye protection is necessary for safe operation.
Zellbiologie
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello! could you help me with this? I´m from biology field and have some difficulties with the following calculation: I want to estimate how much mor UV is coming from a mercury short arc lamp of a fluorescence microscop compared with the sun UV, so that I use the right eye protection for adjusting the microscip light. Maybe just normal sunglasses are enough, but I want to be sure.

When adjusting, you look into the reflected light of the lamp that is inside of a cover. The reflected light on a wall at aprox. 3 m.

So I try to compare the radiant intensity of UV-A -B and C of the mercury short arc lamp (HBO) with those of the sun.

I have the following radiant intensity values per 1000 cd:

220-280 nm UVC = 0,317 W/sr

280-315 nm UVB = 1,165 W/sr

315-380 nm UVA = 2,10 W/sr

Lamp light intensity is 230 cd.

Now I want to convert the values of Radiant intensity (W/sr) in irradiance values. For example the lamp irradiance at a distance of 1 cm. I get 483 mW/cm² for UVA. Is this right?? That means I get much more UV than that coming from the sun at see level (I find in google a value of 0,5 mW/cm²) and should choose not a sunglass but a special UV eye protection.

Thank you very much!

Mara.
 
Last edited:
Science news on Phys.org
UV light from *any* lab source needs to be blocked from reaching the eye, period. There are several ways to do this- goggles, enclosing the light path (some microscopes have a small louvered filter located near the objective).

If you have never aligned a lamp before, find someone who has and get them to show you how- I know several metrology techs that burned their eyes using small Hg penlights because they weren't familiar with the risks and mitigations.
 
Thank you Andy for your kind advise. I am taking it into account.
Mara.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top