Help deriving integer sequence formula

ktoz
Messages
170
Reaction score
12
Hi

I'm playing around with partitions and have come up with an integer sequence representing the maximum number of partitions of various "widths" that display the following properties:

- min values in partition are equal
- max values in partition are equal
- partitions contain equal number of members
- sum of members is equal

For example, given:

min = 1
max = 6
count = 4
sum = 14

There are only two partitions that satisfy the constraints

{1,3,4,6}
{1,2,5,6}

Using a brute force algorithm, I came up with the following maximums for width = {1, 2, 3, 4 ..., 24}

1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 3, 5, 8, 12, 20, 32, 58, 94, 169, 289, 526, 910, 1667, 2934, 5448, 9686, 18084

My algorithm breaks at 25 due to the huge memory trequirements needed to sample every possible combination. I plugged it into http://www.research.att.com/~njas/sequences/" , but no luck.

With a little tweaking, the series seems like it might have some sort of partial relationship with the Fibonacci and Lucas series, but I haven't been able to come up with anything concrete.

Code:
1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 3, 5, 8, 12, 20, 32, 58, 94, 169, 289, 526, 910
 ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  , 1, 2, 3, 5, 8,  13, 21, 34, 55,  89, 144, 233, 377 	(fib)
 --------------------------------------------------------------------
		  1, 1, 2, 3, 4,  7,  11, 24, 39,  86, 145, 293, 533	(partial lucas)
Anyone see the pattern? Or perhaps someone with Mathematica 7 could plug the series into the series calculator and come up with the formula?

Thanks for any help
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
ktoz said:
Hi

I'm playing around with partitions and have come up with an integer sequence representing the maximum number of partitions of various "widths" that display the following properties:

- min values in partition are equal
- max values in partition are equal
- partitions contain equal number of members
- sum of members is equal

For example, given:

min = 1
max = 6
count = 4
sum = 14

There are only two partitions that satisfy the constraints

{1,3,4,6}
{1,2,5,6}

Using a brute force algorithm, I came up with the following maximums for width = {1, 2, 3, 4 ..., 24}

1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 3, 5, 8, 12, 20, 32, 58, 94, 169, 289, 526, 910, 1667, 2934, 5448, 9686, 18084

My algorithm breaks at 25 due to the huge memory trequirements needed to sample every possible combination. I plugged it into http://www.research.att.com/~njas/sequences/" , but no luck.

With a little tweaking, the series seems like it might have some sort of partial relationship with the Fibonacci and Lucas series, but I haven't been able to come up with anything concrete.

Code:
1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 3, 5, 8, 12, 20, 32, 58, 94, 169, 289, 526, 910
 ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  , 1, 2, 3, 5, 8,  13, 21, 34, 55,  89, 144, 233, 377 	(fib)
 --------------------------------------------------------------------
		  1, 1, 2, 3, 4,  7,  11, 24, 39,  86, 145, 293, 533	(partial lucas)
Anyone see the pattern? Or perhaps someone with Mathematica 7 could plug the series into the series calculator and come up with the formula?

Thanks for any help

Could you define "width"? You give 4 variables for widths but you give a sequence for widths = [1,2,3,...} so I don't understand what you mean.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
44
Views
4K
Back
Top