Help Doing an Epsilon Delta Proof

hungryhippo
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



given a function defined by

f(x,y) {= |xy|^a /(x^2+y^2-xy), if (x,y) cannot be (0,0)

and = 0, if (x,y) = (0,0)

Find all values of the real number a such that f is continuous everywhere

e= epsilon
d= delta

In order to prove this, I know I need to do an epsilon delta proof for a limit. I know that,

|(x1,x2)-(y1,y2)| < d
|x1-y1, x2-y2| < d
sqrt ( (x1-y1)^2+(x2-y2)^2 ) < d

since we know, that for one (x,y) = (0,0) the above is just
sqrt(x^2+y^2) < d

also, assuming e<0

we have
|f(x,y)-f(xo,yo)|< e

saying that f(xo,yo) corresponds to when xo = 0 and yo =0, we have
|f(x,y)|< e
||xy|^a /(x^2+y^2-xy)| < e

From here on, I don't know which path to take...I don't have any background on delta epsilon and this is my first time seeing it. So i'd really appreaciate your help :eek:

Thanks in advance :) :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As it stands right now, there's no a that satisfies this, since f will always be discontinuous at the point (x,y) which satisfies x^2+y^2=xy no matter what a you choose.
 
Are you required to use "epsilon-delta"? I would recommend changing to polar coordinates, then taking the limit as r goes to 0. The advantage of polar coordinates here is that the distance from (0,0) depends only on r, not \theta. The function will be continuous at (0,0) if and only if the limit, as r goes to 0, does not depend on \theta.

foxjwill's statement is incorrect. The fact that the denominator goes to 0 does NOT show that the limit does not exist, as, for example, the limit of f(x,y)= (x^2+ y^2- xy)/(x^2+ y^2- xy) as (x, y) goes to 0. There are, in fact, an infinite number of values for a that will make this function continuous at (0, 0).
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top