Help for a hypothesis about gravity etc

  • Thread starter Thread starter ask
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion presents a hypothesis about a theoretical particle called "?tron," which is proposed to be a charged entity that fills space and influences atomic structure and forces. The hypothesis suggests that ?trons, carrying a negative charge, could cluster around atomic nuclei and electrons, forming dense and loose layers that interact through electrostatic forces. This model attempts to explain gravity and magnetism by describing how these layers attract and repel each other, creating magnetic fields. The author acknowledges a lack of formal education in physics and mathematics, seeking feedback on the idea, which parallels concepts like dark matter and antimatter. The conversation highlights the speculative nature of the hypothesis while noting that antimatter is a scientifically validated concept.
ask
Hi Everyone,

Please give some help on an idea of mine, I am a drop out from physics and have poor math skill.

?tron hypothesis

I thought, maybe there is a charged tiny thing exist and fill up the space (like ether). it is too small so we can not detect its mass/charge yet or it has no mass but only charge. Suppose it really exist and carry negative charge and its strength is like e/10^100 (let's call it ?tron).

Then, we can image ?trons attracted by nuclea and form a densed ball around it. And mean time ?trons repelled by electron and form an empty/loose ball around it. Because the nuclea and electron attracts each other, the two balls (one densed and one loosed ?tron ball) will attract each other and form atom. The rest of the space is still fill up with ?tron and its ?tron density is in between the two kind of balls.

In a light atom model, like H, we see two ?tron balls, one is the nuclea with densed ?trons around it, the other one is empty/loosed ?trons around electron. (kind of like an Earth sized beach ball float on Earth sized ocean. The ocean is the nuclea ball and the beach ball is the electron ball)

The H atom act as an dipole, has to marry another H to form H2 to be stable.

For a heavier atom model, like carbon, we see a denser nuclea ball with 6 electron balls around it.

In a very heavy atom, we see very densed nuclea ball with more layers of electron balls around it.

All the balls in all matters, act each other by electro force.

A magnet's structure is like many layers of atoms partially polarized, one direction is nuclear concentrated and the other direction is electron concentrated.

The electron concentrated plate (south pole) repells near by ?trons and form an empty/loose ?tron layer in space. This empty/loose layer will induce ?trons in the near by space to form a dense ?tron layer and so on so on. The dense/loose ?tron layers will attract each other to form magnetic field. The force strength is defined by the density of the ?tron in the field (1/R^3).

The nuclea concentrated plate (north pole) attracts ?tron and form a densed ?tron layer, it induce near by ?trons to form an empty/loose layer, the two layers attract each other and keep forming magnetic field.

Somehow, between matter/mass and matter, even the + - electrical charges are equal, it's net force is a weak attraction. The strength is defined by total charge (proportional to total mass) / R^2.

This is my best guase/explanation for gravity, magnetism and atom model.

Sorry about my poor English, be highly appreciate any comment/teaching/feedback.

Thanks ahead!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sort of sounds like the controversial "dark matter" or "antimatter" which are hypothetical.
 
Anti-matter isn't hypothetical.
 
binzing said:
Sort of sounds like the controversial "dark matter" or "antimatter" which are hypothetical.

Antimatter actually exists. It has been experimentally detected.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antimatter
 
Back
Top