- #1
fred64
- 6
- 0
Hi,
I am creating an helicopter simulation and have a question about calculating the correct helicopter origin of moments.
In its simplest terms, ignoring drag and tail rotor forces and torques I have the main rotor generating an upward thrust from the rotor hub, and gravity generating weight from the center of gravity.
In normal rigid body physics the center of moments is in the center of gravity, being the helicopter suspended at a rotor in my opinion it should be somewhere in between the two.
It can't be at the center of gravity as if the helicopter is inclined in any direction i.e. forward, the main rotor will generate a pitch torque which is not balanced back and the helo will fall nose down...
From my tests the ideal position is centered on the main rotor axis and in line with the perpendicular to the main rotor axis that intersects the tail rotor axis, which otherwise will cause a rolling torque.
I also looked at several helicopter aerodynamics books (especially Bramwell and Johnson) but found no answer.
thanks in advance
Fred
I am creating an helicopter simulation and have a question about calculating the correct helicopter origin of moments.
In its simplest terms, ignoring drag and tail rotor forces and torques I have the main rotor generating an upward thrust from the rotor hub, and gravity generating weight from the center of gravity.
In normal rigid body physics the center of moments is in the center of gravity, being the helicopter suspended at a rotor in my opinion it should be somewhere in between the two.
It can't be at the center of gravity as if the helicopter is inclined in any direction i.e. forward, the main rotor will generate a pitch torque which is not balanced back and the helo will fall nose down...
From my tests the ideal position is centered on the main rotor axis and in line with the perpendicular to the main rotor axis that intersects the tail rotor axis, which otherwise will cause a rolling torque.
I also looked at several helicopter aerodynamics books (especially Bramwell and Johnson) but found no answer.
thanks in advance
Fred