Help, I don't understand Hooke's law and my homework on it.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding Hooke's law in relation to a coil spring problem. A spring with a constant of 54 N/m is analyzed when a 1.0-kg mass is hung from it, extending its length to 35 cm. Participants clarify that the extension of the spring is proportional to the force applied, and the weight of the mass (9.8 N) can be used to calculate how much the spring stretches. The key equation discussed is F = kx, leading to the conclusion that the equilibrium length can be determined by rearranging the formula. The conversation emphasizes the importance of using distinct variables for clarity in calculations.
audreylynn
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Problem)
A coil spring has a spring constant of 54 N/m. If the full length of the spring is 35 cm when a 1.0-kg mass is hung from it, what is the equilibrium length of the spring when the 1.0-kg mass is removed?

I have absolutely no idea how to even start this problem; and I know I can look in the back of the book to get the answer, but I'd reallylike to understand the problem. Any help would be greatly appreciated. :]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi audreylynn! Welcome to PF! :smile:

Hooke's law says that the extension of a spring (the stretched length minus the equilibrium length) is proportional to the force.

Hint: call the equilibrium length x, then the extension is 35 - x. :wink:
 
The spring constant value (54N/m) tells you that for every 54 N of force you apply to the spring it will (if it is physically able to) stretch one meter.
Your one kilo mass has a weight of 9.8 Newtons, which it can apply to the spring if hung on the end.
If 54 N stretches it 1 meter, how far could 9.8 N stretch it?
When you have done this, you know how much the string has stretched (with mass attached) beyond its original length (no mass attached).
You are told how long the spring is with the weight on, so ...
 
Thank you so much! :]

So I would use the equation F=kx with m•g=F.
Then I could just plug in the numbers to the formula as...
9.81=54(x)
9.81=54(.35-x)

Like that's how I'd do it?
 
audreylynn said:
9.81=54(.35-x)

That's it! :smile:

(but never use the same letter for two different things! :rolleyes: :wink: :eek:)
 
Thank you. :]
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top