Help: If A[itex]\subseteq[/itex]B proof C-B[itex]\subseteq[/itex]C-A

  • Thread starter Thread starter ozarga
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around proving that if A is a subset of B, then the difference C - B is a subset of C - A. The initial approach involved element-wise proof and the use of logical rules but led to confusion regarding the existence of elements in the sets. A clearer solution was later proposed, utilizing contraposition and definitions of set complements to establish that if an element is in C - B, it must also be in C - A. The final conclusion confirms that the proof is valid, affirming the relationship between the sets as required. Overall, the discussion highlights the importance of logical reasoning and definitions in set theory proofs.
ozarga
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hello, I'm having problems with the following exercise from my homework.

Proof that when A\subseteqB, then it happens that C-B\subseteqC-A


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


This is how I have been trying to solve it:
1. A\subseteqB // Hyp
2. x\inA\rightarrowx\inB //Element wise proof [1]
3. x\inA \wedge x\inB // which rule allow me to do this? [2]
4. ( x\inA \wedge x\inB) \vee x\inC // Addition [3]
5. (x\inA\veex\inC)\wedge(x\inB\veex\inC) // Distrivutive law [4]
6. x\inA\veex\inC // \wedge OUT [5]
7. x\inB\veex\inC // \wedge OUT [5]
8. y\inC // Hyp (This step is the very confusing one. I'm assuming it exists an element of one set I have no information it actually exists)
9. y\notinB // Modus Ponendo Tollens [7,8]
10. y\inC\wedgey\notinB // \wedge IN [8,9]
11. y\notinA // Modus Ponendo Tollens [6,8]
12. y\inC\wedgey\notinA // \wedge IN [8,11]
13. y\inC\wedgey\notinB \rightarrow y\inC\wedgey\notinA // CP [10, 12]
14. C-B \subseteq C-A // Defs of Difference [13] & Element wise proof

Sorry for my poor english. Thanks in advance for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ozarga said:

Homework Statement


Hello, I'm having problems with the following exercise from my homework.

Proof that when A\subseteqB, then it happens that C-B\subseteqC-A

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution


This is how I have been trying to solve it:
1. A\subseteqB // Hyp
2. x\inA\rightarrowx\inB //Element wise proof [1]
3. x\inA \wedge x\inB // which rule allow me to do this? [2]
4. ( x\inA \wedge x\inB) \vee x\inC // Addition [3]
5. (x\inA\veex\inC)\wedge(x\inB\veex\inC) // Distrivutive law [4]
6. x\inA\veex\inC // \wedge OUT [5]
7. x\inB\veex\inC // \wedge OUT [5]
8. y\inC // Hyp (This step is the very confusing one. I'm assuming it exists an element of one set I have no information it actually exists)
9. y\notinB // Modus Ponendo Tollens [7,8]
10. y\inC\wedgey\notinB // \wedge IN [8,9]
11. y\notinA // Modus Ponendo Tollens [6,8]
12. y\inC\wedgey\notinA // \wedge IN [8,11]
13. y\inC\wedgey\notinB \rightarrow y\inC\wedgey\notinA // CP [10, 12]
14. C-B \subseteq C-A // Defs of Difference [13] & Element wise proof

Sorry for my poor english. Thanks in advance for your help.
Generally, to prove that C-B\subseteq C-A\,, you take an element of set C-B and show that it is an element of set C-A .
 
Thank you SammyS.

I think I figured out:

1. A\subseteqB // hyp
2. x\inA \rightarrow x\inB // for element proof
3. x\notinB \rightarrow x\notinA // Contraposition
4. x\inBc\rightarrowx\inAc // Definition of Set Complement in 3
5. x\inC-B\rightarrowx\inC-A // Definition of Complement in 4
6. C-B\subseteqC-A

Is it right?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top