Help Me Solve Matrix: Show B†A† = C†

  • Thread starter Thread starter theacerf1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix
theacerf1
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Please HELP! Matrix!

Please help me with the below question! I have no idea how to solve this, if someone could please help me with a solution and explain what they did and how they did it, it would be such a BIG help! Thanks! :)


If A is an m×n matrix with (i, j)-entry aij , let A† be the n×m matrix with (i, j)-entry
aji. Show that

(i) if the product C = AB is defined, then so is B†A†,
(ii) B†A† = C†.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


well can you define B ??
 


Thats all the question says, so confused :confused:
 


since C =AB is defined then the matrix AB is defined thus B is defined to be a n x c matrix where c is any number
since A† be the n×m matrix so B† is defined as a c x n so B† A† is defined as a c x m matrix therefore B† A† is defined
 


okay second part comes from the first part if C is AB then it is a m x c matrix use A† is an n x m matrix with (i, j)-entry aij mulitply with B† by saying that B is a c x n matrix with (i, j)-entry bij and mulitply them you will get your answer but one note i didnt give you details so you have to define each matrix
 


can anyone elaborate on this? i still don't get Elabed Haidar's answer. Sorry
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top