Help needed for transformation of stresses in beer and johnston book

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the transformation of stresses in the context of mechanics of materials, specifically addressing confusion over resolving force components in the x' and y' directions. A user is struggling to reconcile their calculations with those presented in the Johnston book, particularly regarding the use of the Pythagorean theorem and the correct application of trigonometric functions. The main issue arises from a misunderstanding of how to properly identify the components of the forces, leading to incorrect assumptions about their relationships. Clarifications reveal that the user initially misidentified the hypotenuse and legs of the triangle involved in the force resolution. Ultimately, the discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly applying geometric principles in vector resolution.
chiraganand
Messages
111
Reaction score
1
Transformation of stresses in beer and johnston mechanics of materials. While reading the section on trsnformation of stresses they have solved by using the force components in x' and y' directions. I have attached a screenshot of the relevant page and the figure. I have few doubt as to how the force components in the x direction are resolved as shown in the book.

When i tried resolving the forces in x' and y' direction i am not getting the solution as in the book but a totally differnt solution. using the pythagoras theorem to determine the resolved forces.

Could someone please help me out as to how the answer in the book is done?
 

Attachments

  • beer and johnston transformation of stresses.jpg
    beer and johnston transformation of stresses.jpg
    13.1 KB · Views: 518
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you show us what you got when you tried? It's a pretty straightforward problem of resolving vectors into their components.
 
whenever is try to resolve the horizontal force in the x' direction i am getting the force component as sigma x into area.. whereas in the book he's getting it as sigma x into (cos theeta) ^2 ... don't know where i am gong wrong..
 
Well, I can't make sense of what you're trying to say. Could you write it out in math?
 
vela said:
Well, I can't make sense of what you're trying to say. Could you write it out in math?

When i resolve the component of the horizontal force σ ΔA cos θ in the x' direction i am getting = σ ΔA
whereas in the book it is σ (ΔA cos θ)cosθ
 
Why are you dividing by the cosine?
 
coz when i a m resolving it i am getting cos θ = σΔAcosθ/(component in x' direction)
 
You do realize that σΔAcosθ is the hypotenuse, right? It's not one of the legs go the triangle as you appear to be assuming.
 
yep now i got it.. taking the reference wrong..
 
Back
Top