Help on Hubble Constant, H0, h100 & Critical Density Rhoc

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the Hubble constant, specifically the expression H0 = 100 h100 km/s/Mpc, where h100 is a dimensionless parameter related to the Hubble constant. The critical density of the universe is expressed as Rhoc = 1.879 h100² kg/m³, leading to confusion about its consistency with the equation Rhoc = 3 H0² / (8πG). Calculations reveal discrepancies between the two expressions for critical density, indicating a potential error in the prefactor used in the equation. Clarification suggests that the correct prefactor should be 1.879 x 10^-26, aligning the equations properly. Understanding these relationships is crucial for accurate cosmological modeling.
Badger01
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
For the most part I've been using the Hubble constant of:
H0 = 72 km/s/Mpc

but I've started seeing it expressed as:
H0 = 100 h100 km/s/Mpc.

what is h100 and why is it coming up in this??

I've also seen the critical density for the shape of the universe (flat/open/closed ect) as:
Rhoc = 1.879 h1002 kg/m3

what does it mean in this context, and as the critical density is given by:
Rhoc = 3 H02/8 pi G

i don't see where you get the 1.879 from even if you do replace the Hubble constant with the above.
i'm really confused, so could some one please help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That does not look consistent:

From your first two equations, it seems that
h_{100}\equiv\frac{72}{100},
but when using that in the bottom two equations, I find
\rho_c\equiv\frac{3H_0^2}{8\pi G}\sim9.74\times10^{-27}\ \text{kg}\cdot\text{m}^{-3},
and
\rho_c\equiv1.879h_{100}^2\ \text{kg}\cdot\text{m}^{-3}\sim9.74\times10^{-1}\ \text{kg}\cdot\text{m}^{-3},
which don't agree. This means that at least one of these equations is not correct.
 
ok, thanks for the help, perhaps i miss understood the definition of h100 or something..
 
What I find on this link: http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/CriticalDensity.html, is that the critical density can be written
\rho_c=\frac{3H^2}{8\pi G}=1.9\times10^{-26}h^2\ \text{kg}\cdot\text{m}^{-3}.
When using this together with the value of h=72/100, it becomes
\rho_c\sim9.85\times10^{-27}\ \text{kg}\cdot\text{m}^{-3}.
It shows that the prefactor 1.879 in your equation should be 1.879\times10^{-26}:smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top