Help on Hubble Constant, H0, h100 & Critical Density Rhoc

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the Hubble constant, specifically the expression H0 = 100 h100 km/s/Mpc, where h100 is a dimensionless parameter related to the Hubble constant. The critical density of the universe is expressed as Rhoc = 1.879 h100² kg/m³, leading to confusion about its consistency with the equation Rhoc = 3 H0² / (8πG). Calculations reveal discrepancies between the two expressions for critical density, indicating a potential error in the prefactor used in the equation. Clarification suggests that the correct prefactor should be 1.879 x 10^-26, aligning the equations properly. Understanding these relationships is crucial for accurate cosmological modeling.
Badger01
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
For the most part I've been using the Hubble constant of:
H0 = 72 km/s/Mpc

but I've started seeing it expressed as:
H0 = 100 h100 km/s/Mpc.

what is h100 and why is it coming up in this??

I've also seen the critical density for the shape of the universe (flat/open/closed ect) as:
Rhoc = 1.879 h1002 kg/m3

what does it mean in this context, and as the critical density is given by:
Rhoc = 3 H02/8 pi G

i don't see where you get the 1.879 from even if you do replace the Hubble constant with the above.
i'm really confused, so could some one please help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That does not look consistent:

From your first two equations, it seems that
h_{100}\equiv\frac{72}{100},
but when using that in the bottom two equations, I find
\rho_c\equiv\frac{3H_0^2}{8\pi G}\sim9.74\times10^{-27}\ \text{kg}\cdot\text{m}^{-3},
and
\rho_c\equiv1.879h_{100}^2\ \text{kg}\cdot\text{m}^{-3}\sim9.74\times10^{-1}\ \text{kg}\cdot\text{m}^{-3},
which don't agree. This means that at least one of these equations is not correct.
 
ok, thanks for the help, perhaps i miss understood the definition of h100 or something..
 
What I find on this link: http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/CriticalDensity.html, is that the critical density can be written
\rho_c=\frac{3H^2}{8\pi G}=1.9\times10^{-26}h^2\ \text{kg}\cdot\text{m}^{-3}.
When using this together with the value of h=72/100, it becomes
\rho_c\sim9.85\times10^{-27}\ \text{kg}\cdot\text{m}^{-3}.
It shows that the prefactor 1.879 in your equation should be 1.879\times10^{-26}:smile:
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top