Solve Physics Q: Acceleration & Velocity of Object

AI Thread Summary
An object starts with a velocity of 5.0 m/s and experiences two different accelerations over specified time intervals. From t = 0 to t = 5 s, the acceleration is 2.5 m/s², and from t = 5 to t = 11 s, it is -0.1 m/s². The average velocity from t = 5 s to t = 11 s was incorrectly calculated as 14.5 m/s, but the correct calculation shows it to be 17.2 m/s. The confusion stemmed from miscalculating the distance covered during the second interval. The final resolution confirmed that the average velocity is indeed 17.2 m/s.
Kennedy
Messages
70
Reaction score
2
✱✱ members are reminded to use the 3–header template provided when seeking help with h/w ✱✱
An object, moving in a straight line, has a velocity of 5.0 m/s at time t = 0. From t = 0 to t = 5 s its acceleration is 2.5 m/s2 , while from t = 5 to t = 11 s its acceleration is - 0.1 m/s2 . Over the time interval t = 5 s to t = 11 s its average velocity is: (a) 15.0 m/s (b) 12.5 m/s (c) 17.2 m/s (d) 14.5 m/s (e) 8.8 m/s

I tried the question by finding the distance covered by the particle after the first time interval, then the second. I subtracted my first distance from the second to have the total distance traveled by the object between 5 and 11 seconds. Then, I divided by 6 for the change in time. My answer was 14.5 m/s, but apparently that's not the right answer. It should be 17.2 m/s according to my answer key, but I have no idea how they arrived at that answer. Can someone please work out the solution to this problem for me, please? I'm going based off of that the average velocity of an object is d/t
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your method is OK, but you must have made a mistake. Please show your calculations. At t=5s, the velocity is 17.5 m/s. At t=11s, it is 16.9 m/s. How could the average possibly be 14.5 m/s, smaller than both the velocity at the beginning and at the end?
 
I had my distance covered in the first time interval to be 56.25 m (from 0 to 5), and my second distance to be 103.56 m (from 5 to 11, starting with an initial speed of 17.5 m/s). So, then the distance covered from 5 to 11 would be 103.56 m - 56.25 m, right? ...and then that answer divided by 6 (time interval)?
 
Oh, I think I figured it out by talking it through. The answer should simply be 103.56/6... which yields 17.2 m/s! THANKS.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top