Help! Quick Question on Calculating Quark Jet Branching Ratios

  • Thread starter Thread starter venomxx
  • Start date Start date
venomxx
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Quick question - Help!

Im working on branching ratios of quark jets, the book is pulling fractions out of nowhere and I am wondering how its getting them!

for example with a beam of e+ and e- colliding you get quark jets, the book says the ratio of the crossections of the collsions going to dd* compared to muons (where* designates the anti-particle) is (1/3)^2 and the ratio given for uu* created is (2/3)^2.

Therefore total = 5/9

The notation the book uses is σ(ee --> dd*)/σ(ee -->mu mu) = (1/3)^2


As the centre of mass energy increases other heavier quarks can become possible...

Can anyone shed light on where these fractions come from? I am sure there easily calculated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


quarks carry different charges than charged leptons -> This changes the magnitude of the coupling-strength

also please use better names for your topics "help" is not a good title...
 


Cheers, i won't use that title again.

Am i right in saying that Up, Charm and Top quarks have 2/3 charge and Down Strange and bottom have -1/3 charge so this is where these fractions come from - the relationship you mentioned with coupling constants and charge?

If that is the case, you say leptons are different so would they have to be treated differently?
 


venomxx said:
Cheers, i won't use that title again.

Am i right in saying that Up, Charm and Top quarks have 2/3 charge and Down Strange and bottom have -1/3 charge so this is where these fractions come from - the relationship you mentioned with coupling constants and charge?

If that is the case, you say leptons are different so would they have to be treated differently?

The electromagnetic force couples to the product of charges of the particles in the interaction vertex, so leptons have integer charges and quarks 3rds of integers therefore you must treat them "different"

You have neglect one thing, that quarks have one additional quantum number, the color, which affects the cross-section (not the interaction itself) by a factor of 3.

The probability to create a red-antired d,dbar pair is the same as a green-antigreend,dbar pair, and so on.
 
Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'
Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is $$ \frac{d}{dr}[\delta_{i+1}] = \frac{2\mu}{\hbar^2}\frac{V(r)}{k^2}\sin(kr + \delta_i)$$ ##\delta_i## is the phase shift for triplet and singlet state, ##\mu## is the reduced mass for neutron-proton, ##k=\sqrt{2\mu E_{cm}/\hbar^2}## is the wave number and ##V(r)## is the potential of interaction like Yukawa, Wood-Saxon, Square well potential, etc. I first...
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top