How do I rearrange an equation involving multiple variables and fractions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter treacleybeak
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To rearrange the equation a = bcde and isolate c, one can divide both sides by bd, resulting in c = a/(bd). Alternatively, dividing sequentially by b and then by d gives c = (a/b)/d, which can be expressed as c = a/(bd) when written in fraction form. It's crucial to note that the placement of parentheses affects the interpretation of the equation, as a/bxd is read as (a/b)xd, while a/(bxd) clarifies the intended division. Proper formatting is essential in a computer test to avoid misinterpretation of the equation. Understanding these nuances ensures accurate representation of mathematical relationships.
treacleybeak
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
i have to rearrange and equation

without using the exact terms its along the lines of a = bcde and i have to make c the subject. have searched my study materiel and I am fine with multiplications etc and doing the same to both sides when doing the rearrangement ie
bcde = a
bcde divided by b = a cancel the b to get cde = a over b (as in a fraction) but how do i write the next divisions ie
cde/d = a over b cancel d to get ce = a over b but where do i put d? do i put a at the top and b and d below with a space between or do i have to write ce = a/b/d

just can't get my head round it and google brought me to you guys

help...
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I will assume that none of b, d and e are zero, otherwise dividing by any of them would be a problem anyway.

If you go back to
bcde = a​
instead of first dividing by b and then by d, you can of course divide by bd. That gives you
bcde/(bd) = cde/d = bce/b = be = a/(bd).​
On the other hand, as you had reasoned already, you can first divide by b and then by d, giving be = (a/b)/d.
This shows that (a/b)/d = a / (b d).
Writing it in fractions: you can put whatever you divide by below the bar:
\frac{\frac{a}{b}}{d} = \frac{a}{b d}

Also note that (a / b) / d is something else than a / (b / d). When in doubt, you can plug in some numbers. Say a = 12, b = 6, d = 3. Then (a / b) / d = (12 / 6) / 3 = 2 / 3 while a / (b / d) = 12 / (6 / 3) = 12 / 2 = 6.
 
\frac{\frac{a}{b}}{d} = \frac{a}{b d}


but does this not indicate a/bxd?

i struggled with fractions 22 years ago at school and never thought id need to bother with them again and while i get what to do with everything else its how to write the equation correctly that's the problem as its on a computer test and if i put a space or symbol in the wrong place i don't get another chance
 
bd means b multiplied by d. It's also written as b d or b*d.
Note that, when you type a/bxd into a computer, it will usually interpret it as (a/b)xd, i.e.
\frac{a}{b} \times d

If you mean
\frac{a}{b \times d}
you should write a/(bxd)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top