Help Solving a Sled Friction Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter saralsaigh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction
AI Thread Summary
A sled is moving at 4.00 m/s on snow with a kinetic friction coefficient of 0.05. To determine how far it travels before stopping, the sled's acceleration can be calculated using the formula a = Uk * g, where g is the acceleration due to gravity. The mass of the sled is not needed for this calculation since it cancels out in the equations. The final distance the sled travels before stopping is 16.3 meters. Understanding the relationship between friction and acceleration is key to solving this problem.
saralsaigh
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Sled question

I have a physics midterm tonite and i was trying some of the practice tests and i got stuck on this question, ur help would be greatly appreciated :)

1. The problem:
A sled is traveling at 4.00m/s along a horizontal stretch of snow. The coefficeint of kinetic friction is Uk=0.05 and the coefficient of static friction Us=0.07. How far does the sled go before stopping?


2.This is my thought process:
Ok I am assuming its moving at constant speed and the acceleration is negative so i drew the FBD with weight down, normal forced up and force of kinetic friction to the left. (Assuming its moving to the right) i thought that Fnet= force of friction (x-direction) = m a , and that by solving for acceleration i can use it to find out the distance however i don't have mass so I didnt know wat to do?! Any suggestions?


3. The answer is actually 16.3m
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why would you need to know the mass?
 
I think if you just follow thru with what you have done already, you are there:

set ma=frictional force and solve for a.
 
well if what i said was correct and fnet(x-direction) = ma = Ff, then
ma = Ukmg right? ohhh ic...lol so a=Ukg... my bad this is where i make another stupid mistake...THANKS
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top