Help test tmrw elastic collision and conservation of momentum problem?

AI Thread Summary
In a perfectly elastic collision problem, Block 1 moves at 10 m/s and Block 2, with twice the mass, moves at 5 m/s. The conservation of momentum equation is applied, leading to the relationship v1 + 2v2 = 20. The mass of Block 1 is denoted as "m" and Block 2 as "2m," allowing for the mass terms to be canceled out in the calculations. Clarification was provided on why the velocities of Block 2 were multiplied by two due to its greater mass.
nchin
Messages
172
Reaction score
0
Block 1 moves with speed of 10m/s to right. It hits block 2 which has twice the mass of block 1 and speed of 5m/s to right. compute the magnitude and direction of block 1 for a perfectly elastic collision.

solution:

u1 = 10m/s
u2 = 5m/s

m1v1 + m2v2 = m1u1 + m2u2 ---->
v1 + 2v2 = u1 + 2u2
... = 10 + 2(5) = 20

(1) v1 + 2v2 = 20

why did u2 and v2 get multiplied by two and why did the m cross out?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I not certain but I think I would go about solving it like this;

The formula you want to use is v'A = ((mA-mB)/(mA + mB))vA

And look at the frame set so that the total velocity of block 1 is actual 10 m/s - 5 m/s so the sped of block one would be 5 m/s.

No guarantee though
 
nchin said:
Block 1 moves with speed of 10m/s to right. It hits block 2 which has twice the mass of block 1 and speed of 5m/s to right. compute the magnitude and direction of block 1 for a perfectly elastic collision.

solution:

u1 = 10m/s
u2 = 5m/s

m1v1 + m2v2 = m1u1 + m2u2 ---->
v1 + 2v2 = u1 + 2u2
... = 10 + 2(5) = 20

(1) v1 + 2v2 = 20

why did u2 and v2 get multiplied by two and why did the m cross out?

The second block has twice as much as the first one. So you can write for the mass of the first block "m" and "2m" for the mass of the second one. As all terms in the equation have the common factor m you can cross it out.

ehild
 
ehild said:
The second block has twice as much as the first one. So you can write for the mass of the first block "m" and "2m" for the mass of the second one. As all terms in the equation have the common factor m you can cross it out.

ehild

thanks!
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top