Help! Troubleshooting Nuclear Decay Equations

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around troubleshooting nuclear decay equations, specifically finding the missing isotope in the reaction Iodine-127 (n, alpha). The user initially guessed Sb-122 as the answer but was incorrect. They seek clarification on how to determine the number of alpha and beta decay reactions needed without a half-life. The correct interpretation of the notation (n, alpha) is emphasized, indicating that Iodine-127, when struck by a neutron, produces another element and an alpha particle. The conversation highlights the need for a better understanding of nuclear decay processes and the equations involved.
MWad
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I'm sorry for posting this another thread, but I accidentally posted under to wrong forum initially and could not figure out how to delete it :-(1. Homework Statement

Find the missing isotope: Iodine-127 (n, alpha)
My answer is Sb- 122 but it was wrong.

Also, how would I go about finding the number of alpha and (negative) beta decay reactions needed to reduce an isotope, if I am not given half life? Please help! I know I am probably making it harder than it has to be!

Homework Equations




I am having a bit of trouble applying nuclear decay reactions. I understand the differences between alpha, beta, and gamma, but cannot seem to solve the equations 100% of the time. I do not know how I would type out alpha, beta, and gamma here, though. So I will just say that given alpha, I know to subtract, and Beta can be positive or negative. Gamma has no addition or subtraction.

The Attempt at a Solution



I wonder if I am just not comprehending what (n,alpha) means. Set up in a way to identify the particles is easy for me, though. As for the question pertaining to the cascade, we never reviewed a problem like that and therefore I would really appreciate someone just offering me a starting point. [/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MWad said:
I'm sorry for posting this another thread, but I accidentally posted under to wrong forum initially and could not figure out how to delete it :-(1. Homework Statement

Find the missing isotope: Iodine-127 (n, alpha)
My answer is Sb- 122 but it was wrong.

Also, how would I go about finding the number of alpha and (negative) beta decay reactions needed to reduce an isotope, if I am not given half life? Please help! I know I am probably making it harder than it has to be!
2. Homework Equations I am having a bit of trouble applying nuclear decay reactions. I understand the differences between alpha, beta, and gamma, but cannot seem to solve the equations 100% of the time. I do not know how I would type out alpha, beta, and gamma here, though. So I will just say that given alpha, I know to subtract, and Beta can be positive or negative. Gamma has no addition or subtraction.3. The Attempt at a Solution

I wonder if I am just not comprehending what (n,alpha) means. Set up in a way to identify the particles is easy for me, though. As for the question pertaining to the cascade, we never reviewed a problem like that and therefore I would really appreciate someone just offering me a starting point.

The reaction: Iodine-127 (n, alpha) is just a shorthand way or writing the following:

127I + n → X + α, or in words

an atom of I-127 when struck by a neutron turns into element X plus one alpha particle.

You have to identify element X and figure out its atomic weight.

[If you want access to certain math and Greek alphabet symbols, hit the ∑ at the end of the toolbar in the Reply Box.]
 
This post was entered ~ 1-mo ago. Are you still in need of some suggestions? jp
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top