Help understanding landau damping derivation

hereboy!!
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I have been given a derivation describing the physics of landau damping, but i don't quite understand it. It starts with the equation for a charged particle in a 1d electric field varying as Eexp[i(kx-wt)] being determined by d2x/dx2=e/m Eexp[i(wt-kx)].

Since we are dealing with a linearized theory in which the perturbation due to the wave
is small, it follows that if the particle starts with velocity u0 at position x0 then we may
substitute x0+u0 t for x in the electric field term. This is actually the position of the particle on its unperturbed trajectory, starting at x = x0 at t = 0. Thus, we obtain

du/dt=e/m Eexp[i (kx0+ku0 t−ωt)] [1]

I understand it up till this point, the next part leaves me confused.

equation [1] yields:

u − u0 =e/m E [[exp i(kx0+ku0 t−ωt) − exp ikx0)]/i(ku0 − ω)]

As k u0 − ω → 0, the above expression reduces to

u − u0 =e/m Et exp ik x0

showing that particles with u0 close to ω/k, that is with velocity components along the
x-axis close to the phase velocity of the wave, have velocity perturbations which grow in
time. These so-called resonant particles gain energy from, or lose energy to, the wave, and are responsible for the damping.

I have attached the derivation that is in my textbook as a separate file, If anyone could point me in the right direction to understanding this it would be greatly appreciated.
 

Attachments

  • landau derivation.jpg
    landau derivation.jpg
    60.3 KB · Views: 464
Physics news on Phys.org
To simplify let Δ = ku0 - ω. Eq [1] is du/dt = e/m Eeikx0 (eiΔt). Integrating the parenthesis wrt t gives u - u0 = e/m Eeikx0 (eiΔt/iΔ). Then to evaluate the limit Δ → 0 we use l'Hopital's rule. Diffierentiate numerator and denominator of the () wrt Δ and get u - u0 = e/m Eeikx0 (it/i), which is what you have.
 
Thanks for the speedy response, very much appreciated!
 
one more thing i forgot to ask, what does u-u0 represent and how does this show that electrons with velocities u0 close to the phase velocity of the wave have pertubations that grow in time?

Best Wishes

G
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top