Help? using physics to predict stunt outcome

  • Thread starter Thread starter DKTKD
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on using physics principles to calculate the feasibility of stopping a 4000 lbs cart traveling at 40 mph within a 5 ft distance. The calculations involve Newton's laws, conservation of energy, and momentum, with a specific emphasis on the tension in steel cables and the mass of sand needed in a metal container to absorb momentum. Participants highlight the importance of determining the friction coefficient between the container and the asphalt, which affects the calculations. The challenge lies in the limited information provided and the need for assumptions, particularly regarding cable specifications and the deceleration rate. Overall, the thread seeks collaborative input on solving the stunt's physics problem effectively.
DKTKD
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hello All,
I reposted this b/c i think i put it in the wrong forum.

Recently I was asked to help provide some off the cuff
calcuations for a stunt being peformed by a friend.
It was a bit of challenge for me since I haven't cracked open a
physics books in a long time.
I used the Newtons laws, standard conservations of energy,
conservation of momentum etc etc.

But I felt like my calculations were missing something.
Either b/c my approach was wrong or I wasn't given
enought info and had to make to many assumptions.

So I wanted to see how everyone here would have
approached the problem and compare notes.

Thanks. Now for the Stunt.

The goal of the stunt was to stop a cart on wheels
(weighing about 4000 lbs) traveling about 40 mph within
5 ft after passing a designated reference point.
At the 5ft mark there is a barrier that we don't want to hit.
Assume the cart/wheel interaction is frictionless.

You are provided with steel cable. Diameter and length have
not been determine as availability is unknown. It is up to you
to help decide what size diameter to use that and what length.
Remember to use your youngs modulus to make sure the
elongation of the steel cable is taken into account for you
5ft stopping distance.

It was only after I performed the calculations that I was told that
I may have two 5/8" steel cables that are about 1000ft long.

At the other end of the steel cable, you are providing with a
metal container with about 10,000lbs of sand bags. Assume
metal container is on asphalt for your friction coefficient.
Extra sand bags (about 1000lbs) are provided in front of the
metal container to be scooped into the container to help absorb
some of the momentum/energy.

And if the sandbags and metal containers were not sufficent
to stop the the cart within 5 ft, large blocks of concrete barriers
up to 30,000 lbs are aviable to stop the metal container.

Also, assume that the metal container will not deform and
that you have spread the ends of the steel cables evenly
as not to overload the fastening points.

Can you stop the cart within 5 ft?
I found this difficult b/c I had even less info to go on originally.

Good luck, let me know what your approach was to solving the problems
or if you have any questions.

Thanks again,
ME
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Assuming that the system is decelerated at a constant rate by the frictional force over the distance d (that is the mass of sand on the container does not change during the deceleration). We get from the constant acceleration equation
v^2 = u^2+2ad
that
a=\frac{v^2}{2d}
which can be evaluated for the required deceleration

Cart:
Therefore the tension in the cable on the cart side can be calculated from
T=ma

Cable:
T&#039;- T = m_ca\ \<br /> \therefore T&#039;= T+m_ca
Which gives the tension in the cable at the container side.
The choice of an appropiate cable mass comes in here. I may attempt the problem of choosing an appropiate cable at a later stage!

Container:
f-T&#039;=m_sa
\mu m_sg-T&#039;=m_sa
m_s=\frac{T&#039;}{\mu g-a}
The required mass of sand on the container can be calculated from this. The kinetic frictional coefficient one need to determine experimentally for the specific surface and container since it's value changes for different surface combinations.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top