How Far Should an Air Tanker Release Its Load to Hit a Target?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kle89
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Airplane
AI Thread Summary
An air tanker flying at 180 m altitude and 80 m/s needs to determine when to release flame retardant to hit a target. The initial approach incorrectly equated horizontal and vertical displacements, leading to confusion. The correct method involves calculating the time it takes for the chemicals to fall 180 m, which is found to be 6 seconds using the equation for vertical motion. By multiplying this time by the horizontal speed, the tanker should release the load 480 m before reaching the target. The final calculations confirm the correct drop distance.
kle89
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Problem
An air tanker flies horizontally at an altitude of 180 m and a speed of 80 m/s over a forest fire. In
order to hit its target with flame retardant chemicals, how far before it is directly over the target should it
release its load? Neglect air resistance.

Using Projectile motion equations
for the horizontal distance, I set it = to x = (80m/s)(t)
for the vertical distance i used y = y' + vy't - 1/2gt^2 getting y = 180 - (.5)(10 m/s^2)(t^2)

I set them equal to each other

(80m/s)(t) = 180 - (.5)(10 m/s^s)(t^s)
solved for t and got 2 seconds.

Am i doing things right so far or did i mess up somewhere? Thanks in advance?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, why did you equate x displacement and y displacements ?
What is required is that by the time the chemicals reach the ground, they must have moved horizontally to the exact point of the fire. Find the time taken for the chemicals to reach the ground. Then you can find the tihe distance it travels in that time and thus get the drop distance. Do you follow ?
 
"y = 180 - (.5)(10 m/s^2)(t^2)"

This makes no sense the way it is. You know the total distance it falls, what are you trying to solve for here? (y is zero, since it is at ground level).

"(80m/s)(t) = 180 - (.5)(10 m/s^s)(t^s)"

This doesn't make sense either. You can't equate y to x to solve for t, which is what it looks like you're trying to do. They are not representing the same distance.

What you need to consider is how long it will take the chemicals to fall from the height of 180 m. Once you have that you can figure out what x should be.
 
Thanks for the input.

I used y = y' + vy't - 1/2gt^2
0 = 180m + 0 - 1/2(9.8m/s^2)t^2
4.9t^2 = 180m
t = 6s

So i would plug this into the horizontal velocity x = 80m/s(6s) = 480m

Thanks, is this correct? perhaps i was thinking way to hard earlier.
 
kle89 said:
Thanks for the input.

I used y = y' + vy't - 1/2gt^2
0 = 180m + 0 - 1/2(9.8m/s^2)t^2
4.9t^2 = 180m
t = 6s

So i would plug this into the horizontal velocity x = 80m/s(6s) = 480m

Thanks, is this correct? perhaps i was thinking way to hard earlier.

That looks good to me.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top