Help with Ansys Electronics error please: "The quality of some mesh elements is not acceptable for solution"

  • Thread starter Thread starter uze1
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The error "The quality of some mesh elements is not acceptable for solution" in Ansys Electronics indicates potential geometry issues, such as sharp angles or self-intersections. Users are advised to provide more details about their simulation, including the source file, to receive effective assistance. Utilizing the Preview Mesh and Geometry Check features can help identify problematic areas in the design. If issues persist, a common troubleshooting method involves incrementally removing parts of the design to isolate the problem. A finer mesh may prolong simulation times and is unlikely to resolve existing meshing issues.
uze1
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
I have error in Ansys Electronics when simulating. I get this error: "The quality of some mesh elements is not acceptable for solution. Please check the geometry for issuesin the following location (x,y,z)".Can someone help me with that?
I have error in Ansys Electronics when simulating. I get this error: "The quality of some mesh elements is not acceptable for solution. Please check the geometry for issuesin the following location (x,y,z)". I have tried to change the mesh to fine, but the simulation is taking over 24 h . This can´t be reasonable. Can someone help me with that?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

Do you think you might be able to get better help from us if you showed us the simulation you are trying to run? We probably are not going to be much help if you don't give us *much* more information. Please at least attach your source file (renamed to *.txt) and tell us what you are trying to simulate.
 
Meshing is always a really tricky issue. It would be difficult even if you called an application engineer for help on it.

What you typically want to look for: Anything with like sharp acute angles or self-intersection; also really long narrow lines can be tricky to mesh mostly because it tries to slice it diagonally. When you have two things touching each other you wont want any overlapping with offsets because the tool tries to simplify the mesh by snapping (I've seen even two overlapping circles of the same size cause mesh issues and that's because the tool doesn't simulate true cylinders it's actually meshing a high N-sided polygon and the two circles can have slightly different mesh causing the shapes to offset)

(Fake examples)
1747980775721.webp


If you can use Preview Mesh this might work even if you can't mesh it, and then you can look and see if there's anything that looks weird and take a closer look. I think I've seen in there like a Geometry Check feature too I would look for that because that can point to things. If you try to mesh it and there's an error you might be able to click on the setup and look at something like Mesh Feedback it'll list off a bunch of errors and sometimes point you to the cause.

You can do it the old school way, which a lot of people end up having to do anyways (and then their intuition helps them avoid it in the future): Delete parts of the design like clip it out or just delete like half the design and see if it meshes, and repeat until you can kind of narrow down or isolate the issue.

Good luck!

edit:

And yes: Finer mesh will take way longer to simulate. If there is meshing issue preventing the simulation from running... this is just my own experience... I've never seen a finer mesh resolve that. I personally don't think that would be the right approach plus if your scope has tighter schedule this would be a problem.
 
Last edited:
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
Thread 'Beauty of old electrical and measuring things, etc.'
Even as a kid, I saw beauty in old devices. That made me want to understand how they worked. I had lots of old things that I keep and now reviving. Old things need to work to see the beauty. Here's what I've done so far. Two views of the gadgets shelves and my small work space: Here's a close up look at the meters, gauges and other measuring things: This is what I think of as surface-mount electrical components and wiring. The components are very old and shows how...

Similar threads

Back
Top