Help with applying Kirchhoff's Law to a circuit

  • Thread starter Thread starter lilcho
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit Law
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on applying Kirchhoff's Laws to a complex circuit with three loops and multiple nodes. Participants clarify that R4 is shorted out due to a continuous wire connecting its ends, resulting in zero voltage drop across it. This simplification allows for a reduced analysis involving only two loops. The conversation also addresses how to determine voltages between nodes A, B, and C, emphasizing that they are at the same potential due to the wire connection. Ultimately, the participants derive equations for the currents based on the potential at the nodes, leading to a clearer understanding of the circuit's behavior.
lilcho
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find out currents I1 – I4 in the scheme shown below. All emfs and resistances are indicated; note the polarity of the batteries.

IMG_20110409_083906.jpg

Homework Equations



Kirchhoff's Junction Rule: The algebraic sum of the currents into any junction is zero.

Kirchhoff's Loop Rule: The algebraic sum of the potential differences in any loop, including those associated with emfs and those of resistive elements must equal zero.

The Attempt at a Solution



I am not sure how to get the currents using Kirchhoff's Laws. And this circuit is very confusing to me due to the 3 loops.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you look closely at the circuit diagram you might notice that both ends of R4 are connected to the same node, that is, a continuous 'wire' runs around the outside loop from one end of R4 to the other. That puts both ends of R4 at the same potential. What does that tell you about the voltage drop across R4, and hence the current through it?
 
Look at the circuit: how are the potentials at nodes A, B and C related?

ehild

Edit: I forgot to attach the modified picture
 

Attachments

  • threeloops.JPG
    threeloops.JPG
    35.6 KB · Views: 490
Last edited:
Thank you gneill and ehild. I am about use the info that you have given me and attempt to solve it. I really appreciate your help.
 
gneill said:
If you look closely at the circuit diagram you might notice that both ends of R4 are connected to the same node, that is, a continuous 'wire' runs around the outside loop from one end of R4 to the other. That puts both ends of R4 at the same potential. What does that tell you about the voltage drop across R4, and hence the current through it?
I am not the best physiscis but I think it means that there is no change in the potential difference therefore the voltage and current remain constant? the voltage drop across R4 is equal to the total Voltage?
 
lilcho said:
I am not the best physiscis but I think it means that there is no change in the potential difference therefore the voltage and current remain constant? the voltage drop across R4 is equal to the total Voltage?

Not only are they constant, they are zero! The wire connection shorts out R4. You can remove R4 entirely from the circuit and it will make no difference. That leaves you with just two loops to deal with.
 
The common potential of the external nodes can be taken zero as gneill said.
If the potential of the middle node is U then U=E-IR for each branch, and there is the nodal law I1+I2+I3=0.

ehild
 
I have been working the problem and after applying Kirchhoff's Law I ended up with 3 equations and 3 unknowns (which are I1,I2 and I3). I can easily see that if each current was .01 that would be a solution but then it wouldn't agree with the nodal law for the middle node. I am confused.
 
Last edited:
Which are your equations?

ehild
 
  • #10
ehild said:
Which are your equations?

ehild

How do I determine the total voltage in a circuit like this?
 
  • #11
What do you mean by "total voltage"? There are several voltages.
 
  • #12
gneill said:
What do you mean by "total voltage"? There are several voltages.

If you look at the image then another person posted: How do I determine what the voltage is between A and B or between B and C? I guess I am just confused a bout the multiple voltage and how they are moving toward the center.
 
  • #13
lilcho said:
If you look at the image then another person posted: How do I determine what the voltage is between A and B or between B and C? I guess I am just confused a bout the multiple voltage and how they are moving toward the center.

There's a wire connecting all three points a, b, and c. Therefore the voltage between them must be zero. Wires are short-circuits. Anything connected by a continuous wire is at the same potential, and is in fact the same circuit node no matter how spread out it is drawn.

Here's the same circuit redrawn with different orientations for the components. All the connections are the same (you should verify this by inspection). Note that R4 is redundant because it is shorted out by the path a-b-c. I've drawn in suggested Kirchoff currents if you choose to solve via KVL.
 

Attachments

  • Loops2.jpg
    Loops2.jpg
    22.6 KB · Views: 494
  • #14
gneill said:
There's a wire connecting all three points a, b, and c. Therefore the voltage between them must be zero. Wires are short-circuits. Anything connected by a continuous wire is at the same potential, and is in fact the same circuit node no matter how spread out it is drawn.

Here's the same circuit redrawn with different orientations for the components. All the connections are the same (you should verify this by inspection). Note that R4 is redundant because it is shorted out by the path a-b-c. I've drawn in suggested Kirchoff currents if you choose to solve via KVL.

Thank you very much. That really cleared things up for me.
 
  • #15
An other way, using the notations in the original figure:

A, B,C are at zero potential and the inner node is at potential U. U=1-100 I1, U=2-200 I2, U=3-100 I3

I1+I2+I3 =0

All currents can be expressed in terms of U.

I1=(1-U)/100, ...

Substituting for the I-s in the nodal equation, you get U.

ehild
 
Back
Top