Help with basical electromagnetics

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nordcus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electromagnetics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on converting vectors from Cartesian to cylindrical coordinates without calculations, specifically for a line charge and a sphere. The radial vector in cylindrical coordinates, denoted as ##\mathbf{a}_\rho##, lies in the z=0 plane, allowing vectors with zero z components to be expressed in its direction. A formal proof exists for the coordinate transformation, though it requires more effort. For the sphere, the components of the vector are derived from the relationship between the radial vector and its cylindrical components, with the azimuthal component being zero. The thread emphasizes the need for resources to better understand orthogonal bases in cylindrical and spherical coordinates.
Nordcus
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hey guys, can someone please help me with this? In the case of the line charge (pictures 1 and 2), can someone please explain to me how he converted the vector R from cartesian coordinates to cylindrical coordinates without doing any calculation?

Also, on the case of the sphere (pictures 3 and 4), I didn't understand how he got the components cos(alpha) az and sin(alpha) ap of the vector ar.

Can someone please recommend me some material or book to study this subject about orthogonal basis of cylindrical and spherical coordinates?

Sorry for my bad english, and thank you very much.

image.jpg


image.jpg


image.jpg


image.jpg
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Nordcus said:
can someone please help me with this? In the case of the line charge (pictures 1 and 2), can someone please explain to me how he converted the vector R from cartesian coordinates to cylindrical coordinates without doing any calculation?
The radial vector ##\mathbf{a}_\rho## in the cylindrical coordinate is a unit vector that lies in the z=0 plane. Therefore, any vector which has zero ##z## component can be written as a vector of appropriate magnitude in the direction of ##\mathbf{a}_\rho##. There is also a more formal prove using the formulae for the coordinate change between Cartesian and cylindrical coordinates. It requires more work but is actually easy to show.
Nordcus said:
Also, on the case of the sphere (pictures 3 and 4), I didn't understand how he got the components cos(alpha) az and sin(alpha) ap of the vector ar.
The author wanted to write ##\mathbf{a}_R## in Cylindrical components. Since the line along ##\mathbf{a}_R## connects a general point with a point on the z axis, the ##\mathbf{a}_\phi## component must be zero leaving only ##\mathbf{a}_\rho## and ##\mathbf{a}_z## only.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top