Help with calculating the range of error accleration

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the range of error in acceleration for a cart rolling down an inclined plane, using Newton's second law. The user seeks to derive the error in acceleration (\Delta a) based on the average deviation in time (\Delta t) while treating displacement (d) as exact. They initially proposed an equation for \Delta a but found it unsatisfactory, later refining it to \Delta a = a(\frac{\Delta d}{d} + \frac{2\Delta t}{t}), which was confirmed as correct. Additionally, they clarified graphing conventions, noting that acceleration should be plotted on the y-axis with mass or sin on the x-axis. The discussion emphasizes the importance of accurate error calculations in experimental physics.
Digitalx04
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Motion on an Incline. I did an experiment where I measured the acceleration of a cart rolling down an inclined plane using 5 different angles and comparing them to those predicted in Newton's 2nd law of motion.

I am trying to figure out the equation I can use to find the \Deltaa using the average deviation in the time as \Deltat. I am treating d (the displacement of the car I used in the experiment) as an exact measurement.

Homework Equations


I used d = \frac{1}{2}at^2 in a previous experiment and solving for a again would yield me a = \frac{2d}{t^2}. I figured I could use this same derivation to solve for \Deltaa which may or may not be my problem.

I also know by Newton's 2nd law that \vec{F}= m\bar{a} and that that a = g sin\theta

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried the range of error for a = \frac{2d}{t^2} coming out with :
\Deltaa = 2\Deltad/\Deltat^2 but this dosn't seem right. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
After some more fiddling I came up with a new equation for \Deltaa being:

\Deltaa = a(\frac{\Delta d}{d} + \frac{2\Delta t}{t})

Would this be the correct formula?
 
Yes, that's right.

p.s. welcome to Physics Forums.
 
Thanks a lot,one more question. When I am doing these graphs it asks me to plot acceleration as a function of mass and another graph of my experimental acceleration as a function of sin. This means that my x-axis for both of these should be my acceleration and my y-axis the dependent variable of sin or mass in each different graph correct?
 
By convention, we usually graph y as a function of x. So a would be along the y-axis in both cases.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top