Help with Coulomb's Law problem needed.

  • Thread starter Thread starter frankfjf
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coulomb's law Law
AI Thread Summary
To determine the coordinates for particle 3 where the net electrostatic force is zero, the problem involves two charged particles, +1.0 microCoulombs and -3.0 microCoulombs, separated by 10.0 cm. The y-coordinate for particle 3 must be zero to maintain equilibrium along the x-axis. The equation derived from Coulomb's Law simplifies to 1E-6/x^2 = 3E-6/(L-x)^2. After manipulating the equation, it becomes clear how to isolate x for the solution. The discussion concludes with the user successfully finding the value of x after receiving guidance.
frankfjf
Messages
166
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In Fig. 21-26, particle 1 of charge +1.0 microCoulombs and particle 2 of charge -3.0 microCoulombs are held at separation L = 10.0cm on an x axis. If particle 3 of unknown charge q3 is to be located such that the net electrostatic force on it from particles 1 and 2 is zero, what must be the (a) x and (b) y coordinates of particle 3?

Fig 21-26 (Sorry, couldn't format the L right, but it's basically the distance between particles q1 and q2.)

-Oq1-------Oq2- X
<----L--->

Homework Equations



F31x + F32x = 0.

The Attempt at a Solution



Since this is only on the x axis, I already know that the answer to b is zero because otherwise equilibrium would be impossible, so really I'm concerned with a. I've eliminated common factors and converted units and end up with an equation looking like 1E-6/x^2 = 3E-6/(L-x)^2. After taking the square roots of both sides to further simplify, I've got something like .001/x = .002/(L-x).

At this point I should be able to solve for x and then plug in L to get my answer, but how can I isolate x here? Did I do something wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
.001/x = .002/(L-x).

Multiply both sides by x

.001 = x*.002/(L-x)

multiply both sides by (L-x)

.001*(L-x) = .002*x

Can you get x now ?
 
Ah, yes I can. Thanks!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top