Help with critical angle calculation

AI Thread Summary
To determine if the penny at the bottom of a pool is visible to an observer, the angle of the light ray must be less than the critical angle of 48.75 degrees, calculated using Snell's law. The apparent depth of the penny is 2.25 meters, which helps in assessing visibility. A suggestion is made to visualize the problem by tracing a light ray from the observer's eye to the water's edge, which aids in finding the necessary distance for visibility. Additionally, for a second penny placed ten times farther away, the light ray's emergence from the water and its angle can be analyzed similarly. Understanding these concepts is crucial for solving the problem effectively before the upcoming test.
shar_p
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A penny sits at the bottom of a pool of water (n=1.33) at a depth of 3.0m. If the observer 1.8m tall stands 30cm away from the ledge, how close to the side can the penny be and still be visible to the observer. Suppose there is another penny 10 times farther away than the 1st one, will a light ray going from this new penny to the top edge of the pool emerge from the water ? And if yes, what is the angle made by the light ray?


Homework Equations


To still be visible, the angle should be less than critical angle, is that correct? but I can't figure this out .. please help


The Attempt at a Solution


real depth = 3.0 so apparent depth can be calculated to be 3/1.33 = 2.25 m.
I can also calculate the critical angle with Snell's sin(theta) = 1.33 (since sin 90 = 1). So theta = 48.75 . Which means that the angle has to be less that 48.75 for the penny to be visible.
Now how do I get the distance from this?

Please help I have a test on Wednesday. Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Why not turn the problem around? Imagine a light ray coming from the observer's eye, grazing the edge of the pool, and going down into the water. Where would it reach the bottom?

Now you've got that distance sorted out you'll be able to attack the next part of the problem.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top