Help with definitions in linear algebra

devoured_elysium
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Having a matrix, how can I know if the function the matrix is representing is:

a) Injective
b) Bijective

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
say the map is L:V-->W

it is injective iff for all w in W, there is at most one v in with with L(v)=w

it is bijective if it is injective and surjective.

These are the definitions. If you're having trouble applying them to a specific problem, you should tell us what the exact problem is and what you've attempted (if anything) and then we can help more.
 
Well, you could look at the definitions of those words! Any function, from one set to another is call "injective" if and only if f(x)= f(y) implies x= y: in other words, different members of the domain are mapped to different members of the range. That does NOT imply "surjective"- that something is mapped to every member of the range. For linear transformations, represented by a matrix, injective means that the domain space is mapped one-to-one to a subspace of the range space: that the rank of the matrix is equal to the dimension of the domain space, not necessairily the dimension of the range space.

In order to be "bijective" a mapping must be both injective and surjective: "one-to-one" and "onto". For a linear transformation represented by a matrix, that means it must be n by n for some positive integer n and have rank n.
 
Thanks by your replies

If I understood well, any matrix with non-zero determinant will be bijective, right?

I don't quite get what you mean by domain space and range space. I know what a vector space is. Is it related to it?

Thanks
 
If f:A-->B is a function, then A is called the domain and the subset f(A) of B is called the range. In the case where f is a linear map from one vector space to another, A is the domain space (or domain vector space) and f(A) is the range space.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
435
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top