Help with Direct Sums of Groups

  • Thread starter Thread starter thoughtinknot
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Groups Sums
thoughtinknot
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let \mathbb{R}*=\mathbb{R}\{0} with multiplication operation. Show that \mathbb{R}*=\mathbb{I}2 ⊕ \mathbb{R}, where the group operation in \mathbb{R} is addition.

Homework Equations


Let {A1,...,An}\subseteqA such that for all a\inA there exists a unique sequence {ak} such that a=a1+...+an where ak\inAk for all k, then A=A1⊕...⊕An

The Attempt at a Solution


Since \mathbb{I}2={-1,1} I don't think I can show that every a*\in\mathbb{R}* can be expressed in a unique way. For example let a+=a*+1 and a-=a*-1, then a*=a+-1=a-+1. Am I defining the cyclic group of order 2 wrong? I'm not that sure about direct sums, our prof spent 5 minutes on them and 40% of our assignment involves them :S
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Am I wrong in thinking this question is incorrect since \mathbb{R} is not contained in \mathbb{R}*, thus \mathbb{R}* ≠ \mathbb{I}2 ⊕ \mathbb{R}?
 
The question is correct. Consider the exponential map.
 
thoughtinknot said:
Am I wrong in thinking this question is incorrect since \mathbb{R} is not contained in \mathbb{R}*, thus \mathbb{R}* ≠ \mathbb{I}2 ⊕ \mathbb{R}?

Well, of course the question is incorrect. The sets can not be equal. However, what the question asks is not whether the sets are equal, but whether they are isomorphic. You need to find an isomorphism between the sets.
 
Okay the exponential map...

So consider (\mathbb{R}+, x) the group of positive real numbers, where x is normal multiplication. Then there exists a mapping, exp:\mathbb{R}\rightarrow\mathbb{R}+ such that exp(r)=er.

This can easily be shown to be an isomorphism, then I can use the cyclic group \mathbb{I}2 to extend this isomorphism to the negative reals aswell.
 
Last edited:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top