Help with electromagnetics problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter formulajoe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electromagnetics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the electric field at a point above a plane of charge with uniform density Ps. The derived expression for the electric field in the z direction is E = Ps/(pi * Eo) * arctan[ab/h(a^2 + b^2 + h^2)^(1/2)]. Participants express difficulties in evaluating the necessary double integrals, particularly when using trigonometric substitutions, leading to confusion over algebraic manipulations. Suggestions include leveraging symmetry to simplify calculations and considering alternative approaches like finding the potential first. The conversation emphasizes patience and persistence in tackling complex integrals.
formulajoe
Messages
177
Reaction score
0
find the electric field at (0,0,h) from the plane of charge
-a < x < a, -b < y < b. electric density is Ps.
the answer is E = Ps/(pi * Eo) * acrtan[ab/h(a^2 + b^2 + h^2)^1/2] in the z direction.
ive got it down to this form

Ps double integral with limits < x < a, -b < y < b [-xdxdy/(h^2 + x^2 + y^2)^3/2 in the x direction
+
double integral with limits < x < a, -b < y < b [-ydxdy/(h^2 + x^2 + y^2)^3/2 in the y direction
+
Ps double integral with limits < x < a, -b < y < b [h*dxdy/(h^2 + x^2 + y^2)^3/2 in the z direction

i don't know how to evaluate these integrals. I've tried, but i end up with a log function when i do trig substitution.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are u sure about the validity of those integrals...?

How would you end up with logarithm when making an apparently useless circular trigonometric substitution...?

Daniel.

P.S.Post you work...
 
you can use symmetry argue the E field pointing to x and y direction are zero... so you don't need to evaluate the first 2 integral

did you try the last integral?use trig substitution to do the last one...
if you have any problem on the last integral... tell me what did you get and hopefully, i could point out your error
 
For the same reason of symmetry,you can set the result as 2-ice the onne for intervals (0,a) and (0,b)

Daniel.

P.S.I'd still vote for \sinh as the substitution.
 
i started with E = integral of Ps dot Ds/4*pi*Eo*r^2 in the Ar direction.
than i went to Ps Ds (r -r')/4*pi*Eo*|r-r'|^3
r - r' = (0,0,h) - (x,y,0) = (-x,-y,h).
i plugged that, and than i found |r-r'|^3 to be (x^2+y^2+h^2)^3/2. than i muliplied (-x,-y,h) by dydx to get double integrals in each direction.

now, on evaluating the integrals in the z direction. our prof solved some similar integrals and said we just could the solved form instead of evaluating the integral everytime. so, on the first one y as a constant. i end up with [1/y^2+h^2]*[x/(x^2+y^2+h^2)^1/2]. i can't follow the steps to solve this integral. I am getting lost in all the algebra.
 
Then don't do it...Nobody is asking you to...

Daniel.
 
huh?
i don't understand.
 
You said that u couldn't do it,because u couldn't handle the algebra behind it.And i advised you not to do it...Or do it when u feel like going through those calculations...

Daniel.
 
the algebra is not tricky, it is messy... If you got stuck on some step, we can pull you out, but it seems like you are scare by the algebra... I'm quite sure you made a minor mistake for this one:
[1/y^2+h^2]*[x/(x^2+y^2+h^2)^1/2]
because you add 1/y^2 to h^2, their units are different, you can't add them together...
Patient is the only way to solve this kind of problem...
 
  • #10
Maybe they're both in the denominator...It would make a bit of sense.

Daniel.
 
  • #11
they are both supposed to be in the denominator. how am i supposed to plug in the limits when the denominator has (x^2 + ... )^1/2
when i do the integral for y, do i use the equation i found from evaluating x?
 
  • #12
\int_{-b}^b \int_{-a}^a \frac{h}{(h^2+x^2+y^2)^{3/2}} dx dy
=\int_{-b}^b \frac{hx}{(h^2+y^2)\sqrt{h^2+y^2+x^2}}|_{-a}^a dy

where as

\frac{hx}{(h^2+y^2)\sqrt{h^2+y^2+x^2}}|_{-a}^a
= \frac{ha}{(h^2+y^2)\sqrt{h^2+y^2+a^2}}-\frac{h(-a)}{(h^2+y^2)\sqrt{h^2+y^2+(-a)^2}}
=\frac{2ha}{(h^2+y^2)\sqrt{h^2+y^2+a^2}}
and plug it back in the original integral...

EDIT:
simple substitution... don't tell me you've never learned that b4
 
Last edited:
  • #13
vincentchan said:
\int_{-b}^b \int_{-a}^a \frac{h}{(h^2+x^2+y^2)^{3/2}} dx dy
=\int_{-b}^b \frac{hx}{(h^2+y^2)\sqrt{h^2+y^2+x^2}}|_{-a}^a dy

where as

\frac{hx}{(h^2+y^2)\sqrt{h^2+y^2+x^2}}|_{-a}^a
= \frac{ha}{(h^2+y^2)\sqrt{h^2+y^2+a^2}}-\frac{h(-a)}{(h^2+y^2)\sqrt{h^2+y^2+(-a)^2}}
=\frac{2ha}{(h^2+y^2)\sqrt{h^2+y^2+a^2}}
and plug it back in the original integral...

EDIT:
simple substitution... don't tell me you've never learned that b4

=\frac{2ha}{(h^2+y^2)\sqrt{h^2+y^2+a^2}}
started with that. i knew how to do the substitution i just wrote something down wrong and couldn't figure out what i did. anyways.

i started with c^2 = a^2 + h^2
y = c^2tan(o)
dy = c^2*sec^2(o).

this leaves
c^2*sec^2(o)/ (numerator)
(c^2-a^2 + c^2*tan^2(o))*(c^2+c^2tan^2(o))^1/2 (denominator)
factoring the c^2 and transforming 1+tan^2(o) into sec^2(o)
i get
c^2*sec^2(o)/
(-a^2+c^2*sec^2(o)*c*sec(o).
the last two terms are after i took the square root of the squared values.
simplifying some i get this

c*sec(o)/
(-a^2 +c^2*sec^2(o))

im stuck here.
 
  • #14
I don't think this integral is solvable,
i'll give you another approach... you can find the potential V first, then take the derivative... I've try this method and it really works...
 
  • #15
Alternatively, you could try the problem in cylindrical co-ordinates.

E_z(h) = 4\rho _s \cdot [\int _0 ^{\pi /4} d \phi \int _0 ^{a~sec \phi} \frac {hr~dr}{(r^2 + h^2)^{3/2}}~ + \int _0 ^{\pi /4} d \phi \int _0 ^{b~sec \phi} \frac {hr~dr}{(r^2 + h^2)^{3/2}}]
 
Back
Top