Help with First Order Differential

Tom Hardy
Messages
45
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


AWzLt5n.jpg

The Attempt at a Solution



The first part is fairly simple I think. It's just rate of accumulation = rate of generation - rate of output(losses)

I'm not too sure how to solve this differential equation. I divide the whole equation through by mc and rearrange but I keep getting an extra constant and I have no idea what to do with it.

I get someone in the form dtheta/dt + P(t)theta = Q(t) + constant and I have no idea how to solve that. Any help will be appreciated, thank you.
[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The term that is messing things up is ## mc_vkt ##. So, first solve the differential equation without that term. You'll get a solution of the form Constant*Something. This gives you an idea of how the solution might look like : try the form C(t)*Something (same Something, now C(t) is what you solve for.)
 
wabbit said:
The term that is messing things up is ## mc_vkt ##. So, first solve the differential equation without that term. You'll get a solution of the form Constant*Something. This gives you an idea of how the solution might look like : try the form C(t)*Something (same Something, now C(t) is what you solve for.)

Hey, thanks for replying. Surely if I just remove a term from the differential I won't be solving what I'm supposed to or am I missing something else? :S
 
Of course you won't, but it's like a warm up lap. The solution to the simplified equation serves you as a basis from which you build the solution to the full equation - this is a very common and useful strategy in diff equations (and not only there)

I told you how in first post
 
Divide your equation through by ##mc_v## and put it in the form$$
\frac{d\theta}{dt}+\alpha \theta = \alpha \theta_w + kt$$That is a constant coefficient linear DE. You can solve it using constant coefficient methods for homogeneous and non-homogeneous equations, or use an integrating factor ##e^{\alpha t}##.
 
  • Like
Likes Tom Hardy
LCKurtz said:
Divide your equation through by ##mc_v## and put it in the form$$
\frac{d\theta}{dt}+\alpha \theta = \alpha \theta_w + kt$$That is a constant coefficient linear DE. You can solve it using constant coefficient methods for homogeneous and non-homogeneous equations, or use an integrating factor ##e^{\alpha t}##.

Hey thanks for answering, I thought about that but surely that's not in the correct form to use an integrating factor? From my notes on the left it should just be Q(t) but we have a constant term in there as well.
 
Tom Hardy said:
Hey thanks for answering, I thought about that but surely that's not in the correct form to use an integrating factor? From my notes on the left it should just be Q(t) but we have a constant term in there as well.
What do you mean by "it" in ... on the left it should just be Q(t) ?

That is the correct integrating factor.

What is the derivative of ## \theta\,e^{\alpha\, t}\ ##?
 
  • Like
Likes Tom Hardy
SammyS said:
What do you mean by "it" in ... on the left it should just be Q(t) ?

That is the correct integrating factor.

What is the derivative of ## \theta\,e^{\alpha\, t}\ ##?

No I get that, it's just that I thought in order to use the integrating factor differentials had to be in the form dy/dx + p(x)y = Q(x)

and LCKurtz reply mentioned dividing through by mc to get dy/dx + p(x)y = Q(x) + constant
I'm just wondering is it still okay to use the IF here?
 
Tom Hardy said:
No I get that, it's just that I thought in order to use the integrating factor differentials had to be in the form dy/dx + p(x)y = Q(x)

and LCKurtz reply mentioned dividing through by mc to get dy/dx + p(x)y = Q(x) + constant
I'm just wondering is it still okay to use the IF here?

Why don't you just try it and see what happens?
 
  • Like
Likes Tom Hardy
  • #10
LCKurtz said:
Why don't you just try it and see what happens?

Fine, I'll give it a go now.
 
  • #11
LCKurtz said:
Why don't you just try it and see what happens?
Ah, it worked out, thank you for your help.
 
Back
Top