Help with Identifying Image: 3K7P0W0

  • Thread starter Thread starter awesomedud
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The image in question appears to depict a toy similar to a Newton's Cradle, but with rolling balls that introduce angular momentum, affecting the transfer of energy during collisions. Unlike the Newton's Cradle, which features suspended balls, this toy's design results in more friction and energy loss, leading to quicker cessation of movement. The track is likely polished wood, which is essential for optimal performance. Observers note that the balls may stick together upon collision, indicating a difference in behavior compared to traditional designs. Overall, this toy's mechanics involve both linear and angular momentum, complicating its dynamics compared to a standard Newton's Cradle.
awesomedud
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
i have no idea what's the point of this if u help me i would relay be thank full


http://imgit.me/i/3K7P0W0.jpeg
 

Attachments

  • ad.jpeg
    ad.jpeg
    29.4 KB · Views: 468
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi
I have never seen one like that but it looks, to me, like a click click click toy, rather like a Newton's Cradle (balls suspended on strings from a frame). You pull one ball up the slope on one side and release it. Because the balls have identical masses, when it hits the other ball, it stops dead and the other one goes off with the same velocity - because the Momentum is transferred from one to the other. There is more friction with this toy than with the Newton's cradle so the movement will die out a bit quicker but it should carry on for a dozen collisions or more before it stops. You need the slot to be clean (polished) for best results and the whole thing should be level, I should think.
 
thanks man i appreciate it ur cool
 
tho surprisingly when i do what u said the balls stick together and move as one until they stop
 
sophiecentaur said:
I have never seen one like that but it looks, to me, like a click click click toy, rather like a Newton's Cradle (balls suspended on strings from a frame). You pull one ball up the slope on one side and release it. Because the balls have identical masses, when it hits the other ball, it stops dead and the other one goes off with the same velocity - because the Momentum is transferred from one to the other.
Unlike in Newton's Cradle these balls are rolling. They have significant angular momentum too, which not transferred fully on collision (and if it was, it would have the wrong direction to make the other ball roll).

It looks like a part of a huge ring shaped ball-bearing. Adjustable wind turbine blades have bearings with balls of about this size.
 
A.T. said:
Unlike in Newton's Cradle these balls are rolling. They have significant angular momentum too, which not transferred fully on collision (and if it was, it would have the wrong direction to make the other ball roll).

It looks like a part of a huge ring shaped ball-bearing. Adjustable wind turbine blades have bearings with balls of about this size.

That track looks like polished wood to me, though.
But yes, the issue with angular momentum would be yet another mechanism for energy loss and slow the oscillations down quicker, though. It would not be hard for someone with the time and inclination to work out the proportion of linear vs angular momentum - which could suggest some ballpark figures for including the rolling. The degree of friction between balls and ball-on-track would affect the details a bit though.
It's definitely not as 'ideal' as Newton's cradle.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
Back
Top