Help with Limits of Integration

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the volume of a hemispheric bowl with radius 'a' and depth 'h' using integration. The user initially applied the limits of integration from 'h' to '0', yielding the volume formula \(\frac{\pi h(3a^2-h^2)}{3}\). However, the textbook solution utilized limits from 'h-a' to '-a', resulting in the formula \(\frac{\pi h^2(3a-h)}{3}\). Both approaches are valid, but the user must adjust their radius expression to \(r = \sqrt{a^2 - (a-y)^2}\) to align with their coordinate system.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integral calculus and volume calculations
  • Familiarity with the concept of hemispherical coordinates
  • Knowledge of the formula for the radius in polar coordinates
  • Ability to manipulate limits of integration
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of volume formulas for hemispherical shapes
  • Learn about coordinate transformations in calculus
  • Explore the application of polar coordinates in integration
  • Review examples of calculating volumes using different limits of integration
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, particularly those focusing on volume calculations and integration techniques, as well as educators teaching these concepts in a mathematical context.

viciousp
Messages
49
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A Hemispheric bowl has a radius of a and a depth of h. Find the Volume

Homework Equations


r= \sqrt{a^2-y^2}<br />

\pi \int{(\sqrt{a^2-y^2)^2)}<br />


The Attempt at a Solution


I solved the integral using the limits h and 0 and got \frac{\pi*h(3a^2-h^2)}{3}.

But the book used h-a and -a and got \frac{\pi*h^2(3a-h)}{3}

My main question is if my limits are acceptable and if the book has the correct one why must I use their limits.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you think about a sphere of radius a, you found the volume of the spherical cap from the "north pole" at y = a down to y = a-h, while the solver for the textbook chose the "south pole" cap from y = -a up to y = h-a .

You call your levels y' = 0 and y' = h , which means you are just choosing a different reference level for "zero" and have the direction of y reversed from the textbook's solver. So fundamentally, there is no difference between your approach and theirs. The transformation suggested by the values above to go from their system to yours is y' = y + h . Your choice of coordinates is completely legitimate.

(Found the problem!)
EDIT: However, while the expression r = \sqrt{a^2 - y^2} works for the solver's choice of coordinates, which measures from the center of the sphere, for your choice, measurements are made from a pole of the sphere. So you must modify your expression to

r = \sqrt{a^2 - (a-y)^2} .
 
Last edited:
Thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K