Help with minor car crash physics

AI Thread Summary
Understanding the physics of a minor car crash at 5 mph involves analyzing concepts like mass, velocity, momentum, and kinetic energy. The collision can be considered either elastic or inelastic, with the assumption that at this low speed, it might be closer to elastic, meaning momentum and kinetic energy are largely conserved. To deepen the analysis, one could calculate the outcomes of both elastic and inelastic collisions and compare them to the actual results of the crash. Additionally, factors such as friction between the cars and the road, as well as rotational kinetic energy, should be considered, as they can affect the collision's behavior and energy distribution.
noobie_physics
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I am new to forums so please excuse my post if it is in the wrong area.

I was wondering whether someone could help me out with understanding the physics involved in a minor car crash between 2 cars (both traveling at 5 mph).
*This is not homework etc, trying to understand a real life accident.

I have started to read up on some areas e.g. Mass of cars, Velocity and Kinetic Energy but need help sticking it all together - unless someone is willing to show me the calculations involved and work it out?(should be able to provide details required).

TIA for any information or pointers.

Kind Regards,
Rhys.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To simplify, consider if it is elastic or inellastic. At 5 mph, it is probably pretty elastic. So, momentum and kinetic energy will be conserved to a high degree (this is just an assumption). You could also take a different approach and consider a different question to answer: how elastic/inelastic is the collision. Then, you could make a calculation for the results of an elastic and an inelastic collision, and compare to the actual results of the collision. You also should probably consider the friction between the cars and the road, and rotational kinetic energy I think should be included as a deviation from perfectly elastic behavior.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top