Help with page 73 of Weinbergs QFT, vol.1

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Reggaerules
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Qft
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the interpretation of equation (2.5.47) from Weinberg's "Quantum Field Theory, Volume 1," specifically regarding the signs in the exponential terms representing rotations. The user initially misinterpreted the signs, leading to confusion about phase differences under parity and time reversal for massless particles. It was clarified that the sign in the exponential is inconsequential, as it merely indicates the direction of rotation, and does not affect parity since parity is not a rotation. The correct representation for rotation around the 3-axis is confirmed to be e^{-i \phi J_3} due to the relationship ω_{12} = -φ.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum field theory concepts
  • Familiarity with rotation operators in quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of parity and time reversal symmetries
  • Proficiency in interpreting mathematical notation in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of parity and time reversal in quantum field theory
  • Explore the differences between active and passive rotations in quantum mechanics
  • Review the derivation and implications of equation (2.4.27) in Weinberg's text
  • Learn about the mathematical representation of rotation operators in quantum systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in theoretical physics, particularly those focusing on quantum field theory, as well as anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of particle physics and symmetries.

Reggaerules
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
In equation (2.5.47),

I am getting
U(R(\hat p) = e^{+i \phi J_3} e^{+i \theta J_2}

Instead of the "-" signs in the exponential. This makes a phase difference under parity and time reversal of a massless particle.

Is this one of the active rotation vs. passive rotation problem? If so, it is not clear to me.

Oops, I think, the problem may be with (2.4.27)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The sign is inconsequential it just tells you which direction you are rotating clockwise or counterclockwise. If you don't like the sign rotate the other direction. It shouldn't effect parity since parity is not a rotation.
 
It turns out that it was an error on my part. For example, for rotation by angle \phi around the 3 axis, I get

e^{-i \phi J_3} since \omega_{12} = - \phi.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
9K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K