Help with page 73 of Weinbergs QFT, vol.1

  • Thread starter Thread starter Reggaerules
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Qft
Reggaerules
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
In equation (2.5.47),

I am getting
U(R(\hat p) = e^{+i \phi J_3} e^{+i \theta J_2}

Instead of the "-" signs in the exponential. This makes a phase difference under parity and time reversal of a massless particle.

Is this one of the active rotation vs. passive rotation problem? If so, it is not clear to me.

Oops, I think, the problem may be with (2.4.27)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The sign is inconsequential it just tells you which direction you are rotating clockwise or counterclockwise. If you don't like the sign rotate the other direction. It shouldn't effect parity since parity is not a rotation.
 
It turns out that it was an error on my part. For example, for rotation by angle \phi around the 3 axis, I get

e^{-i \phi J_3} since \omega_{12} = - \phi.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top