Help with permanent magnets configuration as a movement source.

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of permanent magnets in a specific configuration, particularly focusing on the interaction between a disc magnet and a cylinder magnet. Participants explore the implications of forcing the cylinder magnet into a fixed angular position relative to the disc magnet and whether this can lead to continuous movement or rotation. The conversation includes experimental observations and theoretical considerations regarding magnetic forces and configurations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes an experimental setup where a cylinder magnet is placed on a disc magnet and notes that the cylinder magnet tends to slip in a specific direction when forced to remain in a fixed position.
  • Another participant reflects on past experiences with magnets, suggesting that the configuration may not yield rotation due to a lack of changing conditions, leading to a "sticky point" where the magnet settles.
  • A later reply agrees with the idea that two permanent magnets cannot achieve rotation, reinforcing the notion that magnetic fields are conservative and do not allow for perpetual motion.
  • One participant expresses a desire to achieve constant movement from stationary magnets, proposing that rerouting magnetic fields could be a potential solution, referencing an experimental linear motor.
  • Another participant shares their experimental results, noting that while the cylinder magnet did not spin as expected, it consistently tended to slip in a particular direction, raising questions about the underlying reasons for this behavior.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the configuration does not lead to continuous movement or rotation of the cylinder magnet. However, there are differing views on the implications of the observed forces and the reasons behind the lack of rotation, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention limitations in their experimental setups, such as imbalances in the relative distances of the magnets and the inability to achieve a perfectly balanced system, which may affect the outcomes of their experiments.

sv3ora
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
please delete this post

Hello,
Accidentally I have noticed a strange behaviour using two different magnets, which I would like to discuss.
The picture shows a disc magnet (shown also in the right to see the magnetization) with it's N facing upwards.
Onto the disc magnet N side, a cylinder magnet is placed. When the cylinder magnet is placed, as shown in the picture, an attraction force happens to it's S (as the arrow shows), because it is attracted by the disc magnet N. The cylinder magnet N is repelled as the arrow shows.
All the above are the facts as noticed by experimentation.

Now the question.
If I force the cylinder magnet to this place shown and I do not alow it to move in any direction other than right or left, the magnet tends to slip from my hand and follow the direction of the red arrow.
I think I can explain this fact, what I cannot explain is the next one:

What if I continuously force the cylinder magnet to be in that angular position in respect to the center hole of the disc magnet? Will the cylinder try to move forwards indefinitely, and as a result spin around the center hole? Well, of course not! but why this would not work?

I appreciate your explanations
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
I remember when I was younger working with magnets and trying to get the correct configuration, every time it would never work, no matter how clever I thought I was. The magnets 'knew' and always stopped moving or getting to a sticky point.

With this configuration (if I'm looking at it right), try to imagine the set up where the cylinder magnet can spin around the axis (where the hole is). Let's say we spin it around its axis and take a picture of it at every 36 degrees (10 pictures for a full rotation). You will see it will stop after a bit if spun (from the initial energy you put into rotating it). The reason is, nothing is really changing in this set up.

If you look at the pictures of it spinning and line them up where the cylinder magnet is in the same position in each, you will notice the magnet that is spinning never really does anything. The cylinder magnet never increases its distance from the hole, and doesn't feel a net change if constricted to an axis.

If the magnet is free to 'choose' where to go and not restricted to an axis, the cylinder magnet will reach a point where it will move and settle in a place. If you try to remove it from that place, it will require more energy, as it's at the bottom of the 'magnetic' well.

I hope I see your description correctly, I'll try to draw a picture soon.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Thanks a lot for your explanation,
That was what I initially thought, that nothing really changes there, two permanent magnets can never yeld to a rotation.
Thanks once again
 
No problem! There are some interesting ideas floating around on the web, but as magnetic fields are conservative (like gravity), you can never get more out than in. Keep thinking about them, as this really helps in visualizing and thinking about unrelated things in life.
 
It will be the ultimate challenge to achieve constant movement from stationary magnets and maybe some help components.
I have a feeling that the answer lies in "instantly rerouting" the magnetic field of permanent magnets.
In fact I have seen an experimental linear motor on the web doing so but I cannot find it now.
Thanks for not discouraging new experimenters to experiment even with crazy ideas like this. Even if nothing comes out, we all learn from the mistakes and sometimes the mistakes lead to new ideas :)
 
What picture?
 
That is weird,
Today I tried this configuration without having to hold the magnets with my hands.
I mounted the big disc magnet permanently on the desk using glue.
Then I used a motor form an old computer hard disc (as a bearing only) and I mounted the cylinder magnet to it's moving part, using some metalic tie wraps.
The other part of the motor was stationary glued into another structure above the disc magnet.
The whole purpose was to have the cylinder magnet move freely in circular motion relative to the disc magnet, and always be at the same radius away from the disc magnet center.
I tested this configuration and here are the results:

As blainiac explained, the cylinder magnet did not spin around the disc magnet center! Well it did spin for half a turn and then stoped. But this was not due to this magnet idea, this was due to slight difference in the relative distance or radius of the two magnets (I could never build a perfectly balanced system using so simple materials).

When I made the tie wraps a bit looser, so that the cylinder magnet could barely slip through them, but still be held tight, The magnet tended to slip to the direction shown by the red arrow. But it did not transfer this force to the bearing!

It is really weird to me.
There is always a net force present that tends to slip the cylinder magnet forwards no matter what is the angular position of the cylinder magnet onto the disc one. But no rotation of the magnet occurs!

It seems that it does not work from experimenting, but I do not know why and how the explanation of blainiac applies here. Does it really not work because the relative position of the magnets does not change form one angular position to the other? but what about this force that always tends to slip the cylinder magnet?
I would like to know your thoughts on this.
 

Attachments

  • a.jpg
    a.jpg
    9.8 KB · Views: 560
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
9K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K