Help with Physical Vector problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Timothy S
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physical Vector
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving two asteroids colliding, where the user is seeking help with calculating their velocities after an inelastic collision. Initial calculations for momentum were presented, but a mistake in the z-component of momentum was identified. The key point is that additional information is needed to solve for the velocities after the collision, specifically the nature of the collision and the momentum of one asteroid post-impact. The conversation emphasizes that in a perfectly inelastic collision, the combined momentum before the collision equals the momentum after the collision, allowing for a solution. The user expresses understanding of this concept and seeks to clarify their approach.
Timothy S
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
This is a repost because i realized i put it on the wrong forum section.

After getting Kleppner and Kolenkow's second edition textbook I began my exploration of physics. I'm a sophomore in high school and VERY ignorant in regards to physics so if this question make no sense set me straight. I would appreciate it you told me what mistakes I made throughout the problem and how you would solve it.

I devised the following problem for myself:

Asteroid 1 with a Mass of 300 Kg and a Velocity of V = (20i + 4j - 12z) collides with Asteroid 2 with a Mass of 1800 Kg and a Velocity of V = (-3i - 16j -32z). What is the Angle between the two Asteroids after the collision? What are the two Asteroid's velocities after the collision?

1. I found the Momenta of the two asteroids. (P1 is Asteroid one's momentum. P2 is Asteroid two's momentum.)

Because mass is a scalar quantity, I multiplied the Components of velocity by Mass.

P1 = 300(20i + 4j - 12z) = (6000i + 1200j - 12k)

P2 = 1800(-3i - 16j - 32z) = (-5400i - 28800j - 57600k)

2. Then I got the Angle between the two Momenta Vectors.

cos (θ) = (P1 ⋅ P2) / |P1||P2| = 72.18°
My problem is that i don't know how to obtain the Asteroid's momentum or Velocity after the collision.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You requested that you should be set straight, so excuse me for my corrections.
Timothy S said:
P1 = 300(20i + 4j - 12z) = (6000i + 1200j - 12k)
You did not multiply the mass to the z-component of Asteroid's velocity; it should be

P1 = (6000i + 1200j - 3600k) kg m/sec
Timothy S said:
Asteroid 1 with a Mass of 300 Kg and a Velocity of V = (20i + 4j - 12z) collides with Asteroid 2 with a Mass of 1800 Kg and a Velocity of V = (-3i - 16j -32z). What is the Angle between the two Asteroids after the collision? What are the two Asteroid's velocities after the collision?
Timothy S said:
My problem is that i don't know how to obtain the Asteroid's momentum or Velocity after the collision.
There are too many unknowns that are needed to answer your specific question. For example, was the collision inelastic? Was it elastic? Did the asteroids break apart into significantly massive pieces? Do you know the momentum of one asteroid after the collision? From what you were given so far, the problem can't be solved until you have more information.
 
Thank you. I multiplied the z component on paper i just forgot to type it up. the collision is inelastic. I didn't know you you needed one of the Asteroid's momentum after the impact, it seems like there is plenty of information to derive each Asteroid's velocity without it.
 
To turn this into a legitimate exercise, imagine that the smaller body cleanly embeds itself into the larger one---determine the velocity of the combination. What change in speed has the larger body undergone?
 
Now it can be done; this is an example of a perfectly inelastic collision. The sum of the initial momentum of the two asteroids would equal the momentum of the combined asteroid after the collision. Now you would have enough information to solve the problem.
 
thank you. I think I know what you mean.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top