Help with total capacitance in parallel and in series

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating total capacitance in a timer circuit for an elevator door, which requires a capacitance of 33.0 µF. For the first scenario, a 35.4 µF capacitor is in place, and an additional capacitor must be added in series to achieve the desired capacitance. The required capacitance for the additional capacitor is determined to be 33.0 µF - 35.4 µF = -2.4 µF, indicating a misunderstanding in the approach. In the second scenario, a 32.5 µF capacitor is present, and an additional capacitor must be added in parallel to meet the specification, which will increase the total capacitance.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of capacitor combinations in series and parallel
  • Basic knowledge of capacitance values and units (µF)
  • Familiarity with electrical circuit design principles
  • Ability to apply formulas for total capacitance calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the formulas for combining capacitors in series and parallel
  • Learn about effective capacitance and its implications in circuit design
  • Explore practical applications of capacitors in timer circuits
  • Review common mistakes in capacitor calculations and how to avoid them
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, electronics students, and anyone involved in circuit design and analysis, particularly in applications requiring precise capacitance values.

complexc25
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
According to its design specification, the timer circuit delaying the closing of an elevator door is to have a capacitance of 33.0 µF between two points A and B.
(a) When one circuit is being constructed, the inexpensive but durable capacitor installed between these two points is found to have capacitance 35.4 µF. To meet the specification, one additional capacitor can be placed between the two points. To meet the specification, one additional capacitor can be placed between the two points. Should it be in series or in parallel with the 35.4 µF capacitor? (in series)

What should be its capacitance?

(b) The next circuit comes down the assembly line with capacitance 32.5 µF between A and B. What additional capacitor should be installed in series or in parallel in that circuit, to meet the specification? (parallel)

a) Ct = C1 +C2
33uF = 35.4uF + C2
isn't C2 = 33fF - 34.5uF ??

b) (1/Ct) = (1/C1) + (1/C2)
isn't (1/C2) = (1/33uf) - (1/32.5uF) ??

Im lost here...any help will be apprecieated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For a you have the right answers, but you did the method wrong. How did you manage to do that? Series capacitors add like parallel resistances and parallel add like series resistances. Swap your two procedures and you should be good.
 
complexc25 said:
According to its design specification, the timer circuit delaying the closing of an elevator door is to have a capacitance of 33.0 µF between two points A and B.
(a) When one circuit is being constructed, the inexpensive but durable capacitor installed between these two points is found to have capacitance 35.4 µF. To meet the specification, one additional capacitor can be placed between the two points. To meet the specification, one additional capacitor can be placed between the two points. Should it be in series or in parallel with the 35.4 µF capacitor? (in series)

What should be its capacitance?

Consider the two calculation rules for combining capacitors in series and in parallel. You want the effective capacitance, as the result of putting two capacitors together, to be lower than the capacitance of the single capacitor presently in use. Which combination will allow you to come up with smaller capacitance?

(b) The next circuit comes down the assembly line with capacitance 32.5 µF between A and B. What additional capacitor should be installed in series or in parallel in that circuit, to meet the specification? (parallel)

This is a similar question, but now you want to end up with a larger effective capacitance. Will a series or a parallel combination get you a higher value?
 
thanx for the quick reply guys...dynamicsolo, i should have thought about both of ur conclusions...im dumb :s
 
complexc25 said:
thanx for the quick reply guys...dynamicsolo, i should have thought about both of ur conclusions...im dumb :s

Don't take it as a sign of being dumb -- unfortunately, equations and formulas in courses like these are not always taught with consideration of what happens to the numbers put into them...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
739
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K