Help with use of Chebyshev's inequality and sample size

penguinnnnnx5
Messages
36
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



4307a6c25e65fc6dc596f937b6482d60.png


Homework Equations



P (|Y - μ| < kσ) ≥ 1 - Var(Y)/(k2σ2) = 1 - 1/k2

??

The Attempt at a Solution



using the equation above

1 - 1/k2 = .9

.1 = 1/k2

k2 = 10

k = √10 = 3.162

k = number of standard deviations. After this I don't know where to go.

I don't have a solid understanding of Chebyshev's inequality either.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
penguinnnnnx5 said:

Homework Statement



4307a6c25e65fc6dc596f937b6482d60.png


Homework Equations



P (|Y - μ| < kσ) ≥ 1 - Var(Y)/(k2σ2) = 1 - 1/k2

??

The Attempt at a Solution



using the equation above

1 - 1/k2 = .9

.1 = 1/k2

k2 = 10

k = √10 = 3.162

k = number of standard deviations. After this I don't know where to go.

I don't have a solid understanding of Chebyshev's inequality either.

First figure out what probability you need to find, then worry about how to find it using Chebyshev or some other method. So, if your measurements are ##M_1, M_2, \ldots, M_n##, what is their average, ##\bar{M}##? In terms of ##c## and ##U_1, U_2, \ldots, U_n##, what would be your formula for ##\bar{M}##? What would be the mean and variance of ##\bar{M}## (expressed in terms of ##c, \:n## and other given quantities)? Now how would you express the event "the average is within half a degree of ##c##"? At this point you are ready to apply some probability!
 
Ray Vickson said:
First figure out what probability you need to find, then worry about how to find it using Chebyshev or some other method. So, if your measurements are ##M_1, M_2, \ldots, M_n##, what is their average, ##\bar{M}##? In terms of ##c## and ##U_1, U_2, \ldots, U_n##, what would be your formula for ##\bar{M}##? What would be the mean and variance of ##\bar{M}## (expressed in terms of ##c, \:n## and other given quantities)? Now how would you express the event "the average is within half a degree of ##c##"? At this point you are ready to apply some probability!
I would say that the average ##\bar{M}## ##=## (##n c## + ##U_1, U_2, \ldots, U_n##) / ##n## since you are finding ##c## ##n## times and adding that to all the ##U_i## from each sample. Then to average it, you'd need to divide it by ##n## of course.

If it is half a degree of ##c##, would that mean that ##|\bar{M}## - ##c| >= .5?##
 
penguinnnnnx5 said:
If it is half a degree of ##c##, would that mean that ##|\bar{M}## - ##c| >= .5?##

This would make c the mean, yes? Because it is the expected value/ the value you expect to be correct. Would that make ##U_n## the variance then? But if so, how will we find the variance if ##U_n## is not given? We only know that ##Var(U_n) = 3##

But given what I know now, would this mean then that ##P (|\bar{M} - c| >= .5) = 1 -P (|\bar{M} - c| < .5) = 1 - σ^2 / nε^2## where ε = .5?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top