Hermitian Matrix: Real & Imaginary Parts

  • Thread starter Thread starter EngWiPy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hermitian Matrix
EngWiPy
Messages
1,361
Reaction score
61
Hi,

Suppose that we have a complex matrix \mathbf{H} that is Hermitian. The real part of the matrix will be symmetric, and the imaginary part of the matrix will be anti-symmetric. But what about the diagonal elements in the imaginary part? I mean we deduce that the elements in the diagonal of the imaginary part of the matrix equal the negative of themselves! What does this mean? or am I wrong?

Thanks in advance
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
y = - y implies y = 0 ... the diagonal elements of an hermitian matrix are real numbers.
 
Petr Mugver said:
y = - y implies y = 0 ... the diagonal elements of an hermitian matrix are real numbers.

Are you saying that the diagonal elements of a Hermitian matrix are zero, or real and could be zero?
 
S_David said:
Are you saying that the diagonal elements of a Hermitian matrix are zero, or real and could be zero?

He's saying that the imaginary part must be zero (for a number to be it's own conjugate). So yes he means real numbers not necessarily zero.
 
uart said:
He's saying that the imaginary part must be zero (for a number to be it's own conjugate). So yes he means real numbers not necessarily zero.

Ok, I got it. Thanks a lot.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top