Check If Operator Is Hermitian: Real Eigenvalue Test

kthouz
Messages
188
Reaction score
0
How to check if an operator is hermitian? I mean what is the condition
Actualy, i am using the principe that say that the eigenvalue associated with the operator must be a REAL NUMBER.That is to say that i work out to that eigenvalue and see if it is a real number. Am i right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Using the (x,y) notation for the scalar product, the definition of H^\dagger is

(H^\dagger x,y)=(x,Hy)

and the definition of "hermitian" is H^\dagger=H. So you usually don't have to think about eigenvalues.
 
Fredrik's definition is correct, and it is also true that an operator thus defined has real eigenvalues, as you said.
 
For an hermitian, ALL of the evs must be real.
Just checking one ev isn't enough.
 
clem said:
For an hermitian, ALL of the evs must be real.
Just checking one ev isn't enough.

True, this is necessary, but not sufficient. It is possible that all eigenvalues are
real for a non-Hermitian operator. A very simple example is the 2x2 matrix
((1, 3), (2, 2)) which is not Hermitian, but it has two distinct real eigenvalues,
namely 4 and -1.

On the other hand, Fredrik's definition is a good one, stick to it. It is valid for
all finite dimensional Vector spaces with an inner product. In QM, the vector
space can be infinite dimensional of course. In that case, Fredrik's definition
requires some supplementary conditions about bounded operators.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In her YouTube video Bell’s Theorem Experiments on Entangled Photons, Dr. Fugate shows how polarization-entangled photons violate Bell’s inequality. In this Insight, I will use quantum information theory to explain why such entangled photon-polarization qubits violate the version of Bell’s inequality due to John Clauser, Michael Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard Holt known as the...
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I asked a question related to a table levitating but I am going to try to be specific about my question after one of the forum mentors stated I should make my question more specific (although I'm still not sure why one couldn't have asked if a table levitating is possible according to physics). Specifically, I am interested in knowing how much justification we have for an extreme low probability thermal fluctuation that results in a "miraculous" event compared to, say, a dice roll. Does a...
Back
Top