Hi. Say we want to parametrize the plane R^2.

  • Thread starter Thread starter daudaudaudau
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hi Plane
daudaudaudau
Messages
297
Reaction score
0
Hi. Say we want to parametrize the plane R^2. This can be done for example using (x,y) cartesian, i.e. a pair of intersecting lines, OR (r,theta) polar coordinates, i.e. a half line intersecting a circle. But it cannot be done using (x,r) coordinates, i.e. a line intersecting a circle, because sometimes the line will not intersect the circle, sometimes it will intersect it once and sometimes it will intersect the circle twice! How can I know whether a parametrization is any good? I.e. on what mathematical grounds can I reject the (x,r) parametrization?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org


daudaudaudau said:
Hi. Say we want to parametrize the plane R^2. This can be done for example using (x,y) cartesian, i.e. a pair of intersecting lines, OR (r,theta) polar coordinates, i.e. a half line intersecting a circle. But it cannot be done using (x,r) coordinates, i.e. a line intersecting a circle, because sometimes the line will not intersect the circle, sometimes it will intersect it once and sometimes it will intersect the circle twice! How can I know whether a parametrization is any good? I.e. on what mathematical grounds can I reject the (x,r) parametrization?

You at least need a function from your parameter space (u,v) onto the (x,y) plane. And a function must be single valued. Your example fails because the (x,r) = (1,2) would map to two points: (1,sqrt(3)) and (1,-sqrt(3)).
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top