Hi, with vectors in diff directions

  • Thread starter Thread starter HT2791
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hi Vectors
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the direction and distance of a direct flight from airport A to airport B after a series of vector movements. The first plane's journey involves flying east, then northwest, and finally north, leading to confusion about the angle for the direct flight. The correct angle for the direct flight was identified as approximately 80.14 degrees, but the user struggled with the sign and direction due to the counter-clockwise convention. A suggestion was made to convert vectors into rectangular coordinates for easier addition and to clarify the resultant vector's angle. Understanding vector components and their relationships is emphasized as crucial for solving similar problems in the future.
HT2791
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An airplane starting from airport A flies 247 km east, then 281 km at 29.3 west of north, and then 385 km north to arrive finally at airport B. The next day, another plane flies directly from A to B in a straight line.

In what direction should the pilot travel in this direct flight? Use the counter-clockwise as the positive angular direction from due east, between the limites of -180 and 180 degrees. Assume there is no wind during these flights. Answer in degrees.

part 2
HOw far will the pilot travel?

Homework Equations



Now i looked in my book and found this hefty equation/law:
r^2 = A^2 + B^2 -2ABCosTheta
I used this and found the answer to the second part, which is 639.493 km (I'm right because i checked it online)

Now I'm probably lost because i did the second part before the first part.
I get confused with direction involving angles because sometimes it's confusing if I have to use a negative sign or not, etc etc.

The Attempt at a Solution



This problem is hard to do it on the comp, but i did use the law twice in order to attain the final vector.

Can you get the angle direction? If i do find it, i will post the answer with directions.
Thanks :)

edit:
well i tried and used up all my possible tries so i got 0 pts on it but whatever, correct answer was 80.1422
damn.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know how to convert between polar and rectangular coordinates for vectors? You are given vectors essentially in polar notation (magnitude, direction), but it's a lot easier to add vectors by adding their components in rectangular notation: (x, y) or (E, N) in your case. The easiest way to do this problem is convert each of the initial flight vectors into their rectangular form, add the two sets of components to get the overall resultant, and then convert that answer back to the polar format that the question wants its answers in. Does that make sense?
 
haha I'm sorry to say that no it doesn't.
Actually one of my answers was 80.14, yet i didn't put that because of my fear of getting the sign wrong (and i had already used up my choices)

I actually redrew my diagram and made it somewhat scale.
I basically had a scalene triangle in which the big/inner angle was 155 and i needed to look for the top angle, which was 9.98ish.
I did 180-(90+9.8) and got that 80.14 answer, but just my bad luck and stupid answering that i got it wrong all those times.
It's confusing because it said something about the counterclockwise from east being positive.. but.. bah

______________________
....../
......../
......./
....../

i kept looking to find the right side of the angle, and kept slapping a negative..
when i should have been finding the left angle shaded, and positive.
dangit.. makes me mad.

thanks for your time :)
 
Since you already submitted the problem maybe I can help you understand what's going on and how you can figure out this kind of thing in the future. It's actually really easy once you know what's going on.
HT2791 said:
Now i looked in my book and found this hefty equation/law:

It's much better if you understand what is happening in the equation and how we get the equation.

http://www.math.hmc.edu/calculus/tutorials/reviewtriglogexp/right_triangle.gif
(from http://www.math.hmc.edu/calculus/tutorials/)

You should remember that you can break up any vector into its X and Y components, and when you add those two vectors together you get the original vector back. Think of a right triangle. The hypotenuse is original vector (R), the horizontal side of the triangle is the X component of the vector, and the vertical side is the Y component. This is an EXTREMELY important principle that you will use over and over again!

Remember these trigonometric rules (SohCahToa):
<br /> sin \theta = \frac{y}{R}<br />

<br /> cos \theta = \frac{x}{R}<br />
where R is the length of the resultant vector, x is the length of the horizontal component and y is the length of the vertical component (as in the figure).

Rearranging the above equations, you can find the horizontal and vertical components using:
<br /> y = R sin \theta<br />

<br /> x = R cos \theta<br />

Break up all the vectors into their X and Y components (you won't have to do this with the vectors pointing east and north because they aren't at an angle to the X or Y axis), add all the X components together and call it R_x, add all the Y components together and call it R_y.

You now have the resultant of the vector from point A to B.

To find the angle of the resultant, you can use the Toa part:
<br /> tan \theta = \frac{y}{x}<br />
so
<br /> \theta = tan^{-1}(\frac{y}{x})<br />

Plug your numbers in for the total X and total Y components of the final resultant vector and you have your angle.

I hope this helps you understand where the hefty equation comes from. Usually (if the textbook is any good) an explanation will accompany the equation, showing you how the equation is derived. If you memorize a bunch of equations, you don't understand physics. Try to understand!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top