Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Hidden variables & partial correlations

  1. Dec 24, 2014 #1
    I recently understood Bell’s theorem (the inequality and the QM calculation), with the help of you guys. But something still bothers me: assuming for the moment that Bell’s inequalities were NOT violated by experiment, how we would we understand the dependence of the varying correlations on the angular separation between axes of measurement? How would the hidden variables produce non-correlation at 90 degrees and 50% correlation at 45 degrees?

    In the QM framework, we just say that the operators for orthogonal measurements don’t commute, and we accept the cosine formula. But what do we say about the hidden variable model? Doesn’t the noncorrelation at 90 degrees already demand something like the “noncommuting operators” explanation?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 29, 2014 #2
    Thanks for the post! This is an automated courtesy bump. Sorry you aren't generating responses at the moment. Do you have any further information, come to any new conclusions or is it possible to reword the post?
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Hidden variables & partial correlations
  1. Hidden Variables (Replies: 9)

Loading...