Higgs field and General Relativity

DaveHump3
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
If the Higgs field is responsible for embuing particles with mass, and mass is responsible for gravity, is it possible that the Higgs field will provide the missing link between general relativity and quantum mechanics ie could the Higgs field be the basis of a quantum theory of gravity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
DaveHump3 said:
If the Higgs field is responsible for embuing particles with mass, and mass is responsible for gravity, is it possible that the Higgs field will provide the missing link between general relativity and quantum mechanics ie could the Higgs field be the basis of a quantum theory of gravity?

AFAIK it explains why particles in the Standard Model have "some mass" as opposed to "no mass", but it doesn't shed any useful light on gravity.
 
1) In GR gravity is sourced by all types of energy, momentum, stress, pressure, etc. It's not just about mass. So, the Higgs has no special relationship with gravity. It only relates to mass because of the interaction energy that develops between most particles and the vacuum of the Higgs field.

2) The Higgs isn't even responsible for the large majority of the mass we encounter on a daily basis. Most of the mass in ordinary matter is in nucleons - protons and neutrons. When we talk about the composition of nucleons, we talk about them being constructed from up and down quarks; but, the relevant combinations of quarks turn out to only account for a few percent of the nucleon masses. The rest of that mass actually comes from the binding energy that holds the quarks together. This means that most of the mass we actually see is due to the strong force, not the Higgs. And, this mass would be there even if there were no Higgs and the quarks were massless. The more important effect of the Higgs is that it allow the formation of neutral atoms. Were there no Higgs, electrons would be massless and would not be able to be bound into atoms.
 
  • Like
Likes hsdrop
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top