High energy electron in very deep potential well

blackwater
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Why should a high energy electron have to remain in a deep potential well?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As long as the electron energy is lower than the well, the electron will remain bound. If you are thinking of the infinite potential well, "high energy" is still less than infinity.
 
Orodruin said:
As long as the electron energy is lower than the well, the electron will remain bound.

What if the electron has an energy above the highest bound-state energy but below the top of the well?
 
king vitamin said:
What if the electron has an energy above the highest bound-state energy but below the top of the well?
It cannot. There is no such eigenstate of the Hamiltonian. It might have such an expectation value for the energy. Then it needs to be in a superposition of bound and scattering states.
 
Why an electron having energy above bound state but below top of the well will have no eigenstate of the Hamiltonian? If it has no such energy eigenstate how can it have energy expectation value?

Please Explain.
 
In order to have a definite energy, a state needs to be an eigenstate of the Hamiltonian. There are states which are superpositions of different eigenstates. These states have some probabilities of being in the different eigenstates, meaning that the expectation of the energy does not have to be an energy of an eigenstate.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
36
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
297
Back
Top