High-Precision Timer: Solving a 500ps Accuracy Challenge

  • Thread starter Thread starter Scott Nelson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Timer
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the need for a high-precision timer capable of measuring pulse widths with 500ps accuracy, specifically for an arbitrary signal. A frequency divider is suggested as a potential solution to manage high frequencies, but concerns are raised about its applicability for measuring transition times of digital signals. The conversation also touches on using comparators to trigger and stop the counter for accurate measurements. Additionally, a Time-to-Amplitude Converter (TAC) is mentioned as a method to achieve better resolution than 500ps. The participants are exploring various circuit designs and components to meet the precision requirements for their application.
Scott Nelson
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am designing a board-level circuit to measure pulse width, in which I need a high-precision timer. I want to use a high-speed counter to implement the timer. Since the timer requires an accuracy of 500ps, this implies that the clock to the counter has to run at a frequency of 2GHz. Since I am not designing chip-level circuit, I would like to purchase such an external timer/counter which achieves such precision. Does Anyone have an idea what to buy? If such high precision timer is not easily available in the market, is there anyway I can solve the problem through other means?

Thanks!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
You can use a frequency divider (prescaler) to knock down the frequency of your signal to more manageable levels.

Here is simple divide by 128 or 256 chip:

http://cgi.ebay.com/MB506-FUJITSU-8-Pin-DIP-MB-506-FREQUENCY-PRESCALER-/370284928318?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item5636b39d3e
 
What is the range of pulse widths you need to measure, and do you require 500 ps resolution, or 500 ps accuracy? I have used simple transistor circuits to convert a pulse width to an analog voltage on a capacitor, which can be digitized by an ADC. The analog output voltage signal can be calibrated using pulse width standards.

Bob S
 
Thanks for the input! But What I need to measure is the width of arbitrary signal. Moreover, I also need to measure the signal transition time. How can a frequecy divider be useful in this scenario?


waht said:
You can use a frequency divider (prescaler) to knock down the frequency of your signal to more manageable levels.

Here is simple divide by 128 or 256 chip:

http://cgi.ebay.com/MB506-FUJITSU-8-Pin-DIP-MB-506-FREQUENCY-PRESCALER-/370284928318?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item5636b39d3e
 
Thanks! the spec requires that the resolution to be 500ps, but does not specify the range of pulse widths. Moreover, I also need to measure the transition time of a digital signal (not pulse). I plan to input the signal to two comparators with pre-set start and stop thresholds to trigger and stop the counter. BTW, for the case of pulse, the shape is arbitary, which might mean converting pulse width to volatge not working.


Bob S said:
What is the range of pulse widths you need to measure, and do you require 500 ps resolution, or 500 ps accuracy? I have used simple transistor circuits to convert a pulse width to an analog voltage on a capacitor, which can be digitized by an ADC. The analog output voltage signal can be calibrated using pulse width standards.

Bob S
 
I still don't fully understand your application; e.g., resolution vs. accuracy requirement, etc.

This TAC (Time-to-Amplitude Converter, see Fig. 1) provides the general concept of storing pulse width information as a charge on a capacitor (C101, 330 pF). This circuit can provide resolution much better than 500 ps. Even though I have specific reservations about the design, the concept is correct.

http://www.ko4bb.com/~bruce/TAC.html

Bob S
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top