High-Precision Timer: Solving a 500ps Accuracy Challenge

  • Thread starter Thread starter Scott Nelson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Timer
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the design of a high-precision timer for measuring pulse widths with an accuracy requirement of 500 picoseconds. Participants explore various approaches, including the use of external timers, frequency dividers, and alternative circuit designs, while addressing the challenges of measuring arbitrary signal shapes and transition times.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks recommendations for external timers or counters that can achieve 500 ps accuracy, questioning the availability of such devices.
  • Another participant suggests using a frequency divider (prescaler) to reduce the signal frequency to more manageable levels, providing a link to a specific chip.
  • A participant asks for clarification on the required range of pulse widths and whether the need is for 500 ps resolution or accuracy, sharing an alternative method using transistor circuits to convert pulse widths to an analog voltage.
  • A later reply emphasizes the need to measure arbitrary signal widths and transition times, questioning the utility of a frequency divider in this context.
  • One participant mentions the requirement for 500 ps resolution without specifying the pulse width range, describing a plan to use comparators with preset thresholds to trigger a counter for measuring digital signal transitions.
  • Another participant expresses confusion regarding the application details, particularly the distinction between resolution and accuracy, and introduces the concept of a Time-to-Amplitude Converter (TAC) as a potential solution, noting its capability to achieve better than 500 ps resolution.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying opinions on the best approach to achieve the desired measurement precision. There is no consensus on the effectiveness of the proposed methods, and questions remain about the specific requirements of the application.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not fully clarified the definitions of resolution versus accuracy in their context, and there are unresolved questions about the range of pulse widths and the nature of the signals being measured.

Scott Nelson
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am designing a board-level circuit to measure pulse width, in which I need a high-precision timer. I want to use a high-speed counter to implement the timer. Since the timer requires an accuracy of 500ps, this implies that the clock to the counter has to run at a frequency of 2GHz. Since I am not designing chip-level circuit, I would like to purchase such an external timer/counter which achieves such precision. Does Anyone have an idea what to buy? If such high precision timer is not easily available in the market, is there anyway I can solve the problem through other means?

Thanks!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
You can use a frequency divider (prescaler) to knock down the frequency of your signal to more manageable levels.

Here is simple divide by 128 or 256 chip:

http://cgi.ebay.com/MB506-FUJITSU-8-Pin-DIP-MB-506-FREQUENCY-PRESCALER-/370284928318?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item5636b39d3e
 
What is the range of pulse widths you need to measure, and do you require 500 ps resolution, or 500 ps accuracy? I have used simple transistor circuits to convert a pulse width to an analog voltage on a capacitor, which can be digitized by an ADC. The analog output voltage signal can be calibrated using pulse width standards.

Bob S
 
Thanks for the input! But What I need to measure is the width of arbitrary signal. Moreover, I also need to measure the signal transition time. How can a frequency divider be useful in this scenario?


what said:
You can use a frequency divider (prescaler) to knock down the frequency of your signal to more manageable levels.

Here is simple divide by 128 or 256 chip:

http://cgi.ebay.com/MB506-FUJITSU-8-Pin-DIP-MB-506-FREQUENCY-PRESCALER-/370284928318?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item5636b39d3e
 
Thanks! the spec requires that the resolution to be 500ps, but does not specify the range of pulse widths. Moreover, I also need to measure the transition time of a digital signal (not pulse). I plan to input the signal to two comparators with pre-set start and stop thresholds to trigger and stop the counter. BTW, for the case of pulse, the shape is arbitary, which might mean converting pulse width to volatge not working.


Bob S said:
What is the range of pulse widths you need to measure, and do you require 500 ps resolution, or 500 ps accuracy? I have used simple transistor circuits to convert a pulse width to an analog voltage on a capacitor, which can be digitized by an ADC. The analog output voltage signal can be calibrated using pulse width standards.

Bob S
 
I still don't fully understand your application; e.g., resolution vs. accuracy requirement, etc.

This TAC (Time-to-Amplitude Converter, see Fig. 1) provides the general concept of storing pulse width information as a charge on a capacitor (C101, 330 pF). This circuit can provide resolution much better than 500 ps. Even though I have specific reservations about the design, the concept is correct.

http://www.ko4bb.com/~bruce/TAC.html

Bob S
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
51K