High pressure vs speed of sound?

AI Thread Summary
The speed of sound in air is primarily dependent on temperature, even under high pressure conditions like 1,000 psi. While increased pressure compresses air molecules, reducing their Mean Free Path, this effect is considered negligible for sound speed in ideal gases. The relationship between sound speed and pressure is less significant compared to temperature effects. Research indicates that for real gases, deviations from this principle exist but are minimal. Ultimately, the speed of sound in air can be reliably determined by temperature rather than pressure.
iminhell
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I understand that for normal atmospheric conditions the speed of sound is relative to the temperature. I also understand that the equation uses the input temperature to first figure the density of air. But my question has to do with the effect of high pressure, we'll say above atmospheric to 1,000psi.
Will the speed of sound change because the molecules of air are now more tightly packed in our constant volume and there by their Mean Free Path is less? (meaning that following the temperature model the speed of sound should slow and pressure increases above atmospheric)
Can the speed of sound in air be determined solely from the Mean Free Path?

I've been searching for 2 days now for this answer and have been unable to find one. I did find work by a Martin Greenspan for the speed of sound in vacuum/partial vacuum. But I'm not sure if it applies to air or pressure situations.

Looking for the information pretty much to settle a bet with myself. We tend to argue. More so now that he hasn't been sleeping well and I have. :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For an ideal gas, the sound speed is dependent exclusively on temperature. This will deviate somewhat for a real gas, but not all that much. I haven't looked into it, but my guess would be that the effect of pressure up to 1kpsi is pretty much negligible.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top