High symmetry point in GaAs superlattice

  • Thread starter Thread starter mbarkira
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Point Symmetry
mbarkira
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi
I have a problem that i couldn't solve by myself with my little background. I want to plot the bandstructure for a GaAs superlattice, the z-axis is the 111 direction. The structure is non periodic in the z direction and periodic in the x and y direction. The process is totally different then the bulk situation since that should be a new brillouin zone and a new high symmetry points. I couldn't find the new symmetry points and i couldn't find any good book about this, it is really a big mess for me. so any help will be appreciated.

Thanks
Raouf


NB: I am really new in the field.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can try to use a plane wave expansion approach for solving the Schrödinger equation for the superlattice. This is commonly used in electronic structure calculations, and it should provide you with the band structure of the system. You can find more information about this method in textbooks on computational solid state physics or quantum mechanics. Additionally, many numerical packages such as VASP and Quantum Espresso are available for performing such calculations.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top