Higher Order ODE - Multiple Complex Roots?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a fourth-order ordinary differential equation (ODE) characterized by the equation (D^4 + 5D^2 + 4)y = 0, with specified initial conditions. Participants are examining the roots of the characteristic polynomial λ^4 - 5λ^2 + 4 = 0 and their implications for the general solution of the ODE.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to identify the roots of the characteristic equation and expresses uncertainty about their classification as complex roots. Questions arise regarding the correct interpretation of these roots and the formulation of the general solution. Other participants clarify the nature of the roots and discuss the conditions for double roots in differential equations.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the definitions and classifications of roots in the context of the problem. Some participants have provided clarifications regarding the nature of complex roots and their occurrence in pairs, while the original poster reflects on their understanding of these concepts. The discussion appears to be productive, with participants engaging in clarifying misconceptions.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating definitions related to roots, including double roots and complex conjugate roots, and are questioning the implications of these definitions in the context of the given ODE. There is mention of the constraints of real coefficients in the characteristic equation.

kape
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Hello, I have two questions about this problem:

[tex](D^4 + 5D^2 + 4)y = 0[/tex]

y(0) = 10
y'(0) = 10
y''(0) = 6
y'''(0) = 8

[tex]\lambda^4 - 5\lambda^2 + 4 = 0[/tex]

[tex](\lambda^2 + 4) (\lambda^2 + 1)[/tex]

Until here I am fairly sure that I didn't mess it up..
But I'm not sure if I have the roots correct. Are the roots:

Root1:
[tex]\lambda^2 = -4[/tex]
[tex]\lambda = \pm\sqrt-4[/tex]
[tex]\lambda = \pm\sqrt-1 \cdot \pm\sqrt4[/tex]
[tex]\lambda = \pm2i[/tex]

Root2:
[tex]\lambda^2 = -1[/tex]
[tex]\lambda = \pm\sqrt-1[/tex]
[tex]\lambda = \pm1i[/tex]

So this is a complex double root (I think?) and the equation should be:

[tex]y = e^{\gamma x} [ (A_1 + A_2x) cos\omegax + (B_1 + B_2x) sin\omegax ][/tex]

Making it:

[tex]y = e^{(0)x} [ (A_1 + A_2x) cos2x + (B_1 + B_2x) sinx ][/tex]



* [Question 1]: Is this the right way to proceed?



Because, I finished the problem and it turned out to be wrong... (and it took a long time to differentiate it 3 times too.. and even longer to check it again.. twice.. *sigh*)


Also, I'm not sure exactly how I am supposed to find [tex]\inline \gamma[/tex] in [tex]\inline e^{\gammax}[/tex]...

Is it right to think that if the root is [tex]\inline \lambda = 5 \pm 3i[/tex] then [tex]\inline \gamma[/tex] is 5 and [tex]\inline \omega[/tex] is 3? (making the equation:)

[tex]y = e^{5x} [ (A_1 + A_2x) cos3x + (B_1 + B_2x) sin\omegax ][/tex]

But this must be wrong because what if the other root has a value added to the multiple of the i value too?

* [Question 2] How do you find [tex]\inline \gamma[/tex] ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So this is a complex double root (I think?)
Nope -- you have four distinct roots, none of them are a double root.
 
Just checking, I'm pretty sure it's just a typo but your indicial equation(with a lambda)has a minus where there should be a plus, but you still factor it the way it should be, but just fyi

yah, you've got 4 roots, remember, complex roots always come in pairs like that('cuz of the +- nature of the quadratic equation), you're never going to get a root that's JUST +2i, it's always going to be + or - 2i, so you don't need to worry about that double root jazz
 
Sometimes you do. For example, his differential operator could have been:

(D² + 1)²

which does have double roots.
 
schattenjaeger said:
Jyah, you've got 4 roots, remember, complex roots always come in pairs like that('cuz of the +- nature of the quadratic equation), you're never going to get a root that's JUST +2i, it's always going to be + or - 2i, so you don't need to worry about that double root jazz
...for real coefficients.

How's about:

[tex]\lambda^2-4i\lambda-4=0[/tex]?

:smile:
 
We were talking about differential equations with real coefficients so a characteristic equation like that would never occur.

In order to have double complex roots, since in an equation with real coefficients roots are always in complex conjugate pairs, your equation would have to be of at least 4th order as Hurkyl said.
 
Oh I see.. four distinct roots! Thank you. I managed to solve the problem without any difficulties!

I guess I was muddled with the definitions of roots...

I've been looking through my textbook but I'm still not exactly sure of the definitions..

-----------------
Am I right to think:

- Double Root: Where two "roots" are the same; [tex]\inine (a - 1)^2, a_1 = 1, a_2 = 1[/tex]

- Complex Conjugate Roots: Where the roots are [tex]\inline \pm \omegai[/tex] (does conjugate mean +/- ?)

- Complex Conjugate Double Roots: Like... (D^2 + 1)^2

- Multiple Complex Conjugate Roots: actually, I don't quite understand what this is. What IS this? And how do you find gamma??
 
Last edited:
HallsofIvy said:
We were talking about differential equations with real coefficients so a characteristic equation like that would never occur.
Yeah - but you can have differential equations with complex coefficients, eg. vibroelastic stiffness. It's not completely correct to suggest that the quadratic equation throws up conjugate roots always.

It's worth pointing this out to the OP.
 

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K